Comments on: American “E Series”

By: KimJongStalin The 3rd

KimJongStalin The 3rd — Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:26:57 +0000

So the 150t design is essentially a tank…mounted on another tank.

*Insert Yo Dawg/Tankception pic here*

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:53:27 +0000

The idea seems to be getting a lot of track contact area ergo low ground pressure without the well-known problems associated with high lenght-to-width ratios. Kind of a Rube Goldberg solution though.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:54:02 +0000

Because you totally can’t electronically synchronise the front and back engines via the rotary joint or anything.

Also good luck maneuvering a rigid hull of comparable dimensions…

By: P4

P4 — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:49:36 +0000

Well now that you’ve explained it, it seems so easy!

By: Vio

Vio — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:42:58 +0000

That 150t… What the actual fuck.

By: Zaton

Zaton — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:35:27 +0000

What would be the benefit of tracks like that, compared to the usual ones?

By: Zarax

Zarax — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:03:25 +0000

What was shared was the suspension pack, pretty much always the same, just different number of roadwheels.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 03:23:13 +0000

5 “easy” step to turn the tank:
1. Shut down the engine in the back part.
2. Turn the front part to the direction you want.
3. Restart engine in the back
4. Use front part as ‘the lead” and back part as “gravity point”, turning the tank
5. when turning done, turn the front part back straight with the back, start moving
it’ll take may be 15 min to turn left or right IRL , and epic fail in CQC, when it turn in corner in city.

By: Priory_of_Sion

Priory_of_Sion — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:05 +0000

Pretty much what I was thinking.

By: Westonbirt_EU

Westonbirt_EU — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:02:55 +0000

IF IT DOESN’T HAVE DUAL MAIN GUNS IT DOESN’T COUNT. EVER.