<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japanese tier 10 STB-1 &#8211; armor schematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melcyna</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-71653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melcyna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-71653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To give an idea of why the searchlight had to be so big, we&#039;re talking tank gunnery engagement range of several kilometers... 

this is equivalent to the anti aircraft search light range (except using IR light and not visual wavelength light)

so essentially think of those big giant massive search light of WW2 used to illuminate bombers in the sky, but this time it&#039;s shining IR light downrange to targets on the ground...

if you think of it that way, it&#039;s AMAZING that the light is that small for all intent and purpose...

rocket pods incidentally are pretty redundant and useless for MBT in the first place...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To give an idea of why the searchlight had to be so big, we&#8217;re talking tank gunnery engagement range of several kilometers&#8230; </p>
<p>this is equivalent to the anti aircraft search light range (except using IR light and not visual wavelength light)</p>
<p>so essentially think of those big giant massive search light of WW2 used to illuminate bombers in the sky, but this time it&#8217;s shining IR light downrange to targets on the ground&#8230;</p>
<p>if you think of it that way, it&#8217;s AMAZING that the light is that small for all intent and purpose&#8230;</p>
<p>rocket pods incidentally are pretty redundant and useless for MBT in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://i.imgur.com/s3RdI9T.png]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i.imgur.com/s3RdI9T.png" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/s3RdI9T.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s why you&#039;re still single, mate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why you&#8217;re still single, mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yup</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is middle or top? top seems even more angled, atleast 10% than middle, so if its 65% on middle, top very well could be bounce city with 75% angle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is middle or top? top seems even more angled, atleast 10% than middle, so if its 65% on middle, top very well could be bounce city with 75% angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Platypusbill</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Platypusbill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the prototype of the Type 74, not the production vehicle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the prototype of the Type 74, not the production vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Moynihan (Polandballs World of Tanks News)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Moynihan (Polandballs World of Tanks News)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think thats a bit of a jump. We dont know how WG will treat Jap tanks, unlike german tanks (like the Marder)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think thats a bit of a jump. We dont know how WG will treat Jap tanks, unlike german tanks (like the Marder)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[65 degrees]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>65 degrees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yup</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whats the angle of front hull? if its 70%+  it can auto bounce and troll alot of shells.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Japanese_-_Type_74_tank_-_2.jpg looks like this could bounce a lot of badly placed shells from tier 8-9. Obviously tier 10 bounce would be rare on this tank hull, but not impossible. The front armor of turrets is great, but god damn huge cupola. Even derp 0.40 + accuracy guns will have no problem hitting it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats the angle of front hull? if its 70%+  it can auto bounce and troll alot of shells.<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Japanese_-_Type_74_tank_-_2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Japanese_-_Type_74_tank_-_2.jpg</a> looks like this could bounce a lot of badly placed shells from tier 8-9. Obviously tier 10 bounce would be rare on this tank hull, but not impossible. The front armor of turrets is great, but god damn huge cupola. Even derp 0.40 + accuracy guns will have no problem hitting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demonsmaycry</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[demonsmaycry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another leopard style tier X with paper armor..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another leopard style tier X with paper armor..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sl8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/27/japanese-tier-10-stb-1-armor-schematics/#comment-70373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sl8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4674#comment-70373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, late Cold War would be the 70-80s when the Abrams, Challenger 2, T-80 were developed with laminated armour, ceramic components, ERA, etc. Those nimble glass cannons were developed in the early to mid Cold War period 50-60s, when gun penetration greatly outpaced RHA types of armor design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, late Cold War would be the 70-80s when the Abrams, Challenger 2, T-80 were developed with laminated armour, ceramic components, ERA, etc. Those nimble glass cannons were developed in the early to mid Cold War period 50-60s, when gun penetration greatly outpaced RHA types of armor design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
