Comments on: Universal Carrier in German service

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:07:46 +0000

The Reapers apparently fail both physics and elementary economic logic.

By: The guy behind you that hides if u look for him

The guy behind you that hides if u look for him — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:50:38 +0000

und dann auch noch so nen hässlichen…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:04:38 +0000

Goldiggers are everywhere !

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:19:27 +0000

Hmm…does anyone else see either the
4 cm PaK 192 (e) auf Selbstfahrlafette Bren(e) or the 4,7 cm Pak 188 (h) auf Selbstfahrlafette Bren (e) possibly being added as premium TDs, possibly at tier 3 in a way mirroring the French FCM Pak 36 (aka “Marder I”)?

By: Amx-40

Amx-40 — Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:29:11 +0000

But i can…

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:14:11 +0000

I know the Free French managed to cram 25mm AT guns into the rather meh (original armament: Boys plus MG) armoured cars the Brits could initially spare for them in N. Africa, being big believers in “reconnaissance by fire”, but obviously that’s not terribly relevant for WoT…

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:07:24 +0000

One thing the UC would’ve had going for itself over the halftracks would have been sheer *size*; the latter were almost without exception rather large vehicles whereas the Carrier was freakin’ tiny ergo that much marder to detect and hit, which isn’t a bad thing when your plates only stop small arms. Also cross-country mobility was probably better – AFAIK halftracks are all other things being equal inferior to fully-tracked vehicles in that regard – and I understand the halfies could no more turn (more or less) on the spot that fully wheeled vehicles.

By: Lorraine40t

Lorraine40t — Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:05:52 +0000

You cant catch me, 113.

By: Reaper Tripod

Reaper Tripod — Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:08:31 +0000

and the Reaper harvests Biomass to turn into energy :)

By: OP

OP — Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:26:19 +0000

it is not ‘quit’e unique or ‘rather’ unique.
Unique means unique and it couldnt be nearly unique or very unique either. Other than that a very interesting article, thank you.