Comments on: 8.9 official vehicle changes http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Robi http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71590 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:54:24 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71590 It’s not that, it is stupid that they buff some tanks calling it ‘historical’, while keeping hell lot of more unhistorical for balancing reasons, like e.g. why Lee can use the hull 75 mm gun, while B1 must use the puny 47 mm turret one?

]]> By: Adam Meizner http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71326 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:28:22 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71326 You know what they say: there are no girls on the internet :)

]]> By: mechwarrior73 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71325 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:26:04 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71325 An arty buff?….hell hath frozen over, judgement day is upon us!!! Lol its nice to see arty getting some love, I just wish I had any of the ones being buffed…how is tiger p? I have been considering buying it for a t8 to play in platoons

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71320 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:15:24 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71320 You got refunded 51k exp for the 50k exp engine.

You were given the new engine which cost 26k exp and you were given 25k free exp.

]]> By: Tullus http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71288 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:23:58 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71288 A slow gun traverse will get you killed quicly enough.. Just ask any Hellcat driver

]]> By: martinez http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71276 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:03:11 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71276 Haters gonna hate.

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71202 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:11:52 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71202 I think peering through the bottom of an empty bottle of hard liquor is required.

]]> By: Daigensui http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71201 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:11:26 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71201 And she stealed my account.

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71199 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:10:19 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71199 For pretty much all practical intents and purposes it wasn’t even nerfed, dumbass. Oh and “I can play just fine” sounds terribly unconvincing coming from an Anonymous whinebitch who doesn’t even use his ingame nick so we could check.

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/28/8-9-official-vehicle-changes/#comment-71197 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:08:07 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4705#comment-71197 M-number basically means “officially accepted to service”. The military pretty much took one good look at the thing and decided it wasn’t worth the hassle of shipping overseas, so the smallish bunch that got built stayed Stateside to delight the young and old alike in publicity shows and the like.

Most definitely “left testing range”, however, which was the point.

]]>