Comments on: 30.10.2013

By: 30.10.2013 | WoTRomania

30.10.2013 | WoTRomania — Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:45:07 +0000

[...] Sursa [...]

By: yourNightMARE

yourNightMARE — Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:24:14 +0000

Not to mention new players get confused a lot more about these damage shown numbers from WoT, because they think their guns can do up to XXXXX damage, when in reality, the target was hit by at least two shells.
But hey, we got XVM, what would those guys do if WG would do their job?!

By: myself

myself — Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:47:39 +0000

I don’t know about ramming damage as I didn’t pay attention to that very closely, but I love the spall liner when it comes to HE shells. Got 4 direct hits from a 13f3 in my KV-4 and barely got any damage from them ;)

By: Baldrickk

Baldrickk — Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:36:51 +0000

I know people who thought that at thr beginning. It’s very easy to do. For me, I prefer to play with as muvh info as possible, so xvm, map as big as possible, teamlist expanded to max, custom xvm config adding extra info to tanks

By: OOPMan

OOPMan — Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:34:19 +0000

- installing a wet ammo rack apparently doesn’t increase your ramming damage (SS: it’s not as stupid question as it sounds: wet ammo rack has a certain weight, that adds to the mass of the vehicle, increasing the damage done by the vehicle based on its weight by cca 1 percent, however, this increased mass also causes the vehicle to go slower, so all in all it’s the same)

I actually took the time to run the numbers on ramming damage a while back. The source of the ramming damage was (obviously) my KV-5. The target I picked was the Lowe (Because it’s quite heavy and hence doesn’t give you an over-inflated sense of the damage ramming does). I calculated with Spall Liner and without Spall Liner.

At the end the day, the difference in damage provided by the extra 1-ton of Spall Liner was paltry, something like 0.001% more damage with Spall Liner.

Moral of the story: Loading Spall Liner because it increase ramming damage is dumb, the difference is so insignificant as to be worthless 99% of the time.

By: kray

kray — Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:23:41 +0000

Always same story.Managers, who clueless about market and own products.
Look at decisions and big fails of those firms: Sony-PS3, Ced-Alpha CPU,Cornered Rat-wwiionline ,Nokia-Winos,MS-killing XP etc…Now WT and WOT running full speed on the same way.

By: bojan

bojan — Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:40:22 +0000

I had steel wall on it.
I also have it on comet (those on EU can check).

By: Leobeard

Leobeard — Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:36:46 +0000

- when a bunch of allied tanks hit the enemy tank at the same time, the damage “adds” and only one amount of hitpoints gets deducted (SS: as in, one tank hits for 150 and the other for 140 at the same time – both see that the enemy vehicle loses 290 hitpoints), it is possible to separate it, but it won’t be done in order not to spam the player with too much info

Moronic. Protect player from too much info by presenting wrong info. I bet 2 noobs out of 3 think they are shooting some 500 damage shots with their T-34 sometimes.

By: Anon

Anon — Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:17:10 +0000

At least the 113 won’t get depressed about this.

By: 112

112 — Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:03:27 +0000

True that