<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowe buff in following patches + bugfix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-83648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-83648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then why dont u put 15 cm cannon in it because that was historical too.

There is no reason to give 1000 hp engine because its not historical and if we are keeping up to historical designs with this tank then why this &quot;up&quot; was not implemented?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why dont u put 15 cm cannon in it because that was historical too.</p>
<p>There is no reason to give 1000 hp engine because its not historical and if we are keeping up to historical designs with this tank then why this &#8220;up&#8221; was not implemented?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vrender</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-79464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vrender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-79464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lame for the Lowe to be buffed only with armor in head and the gun depresion and elevation that he had 2y agoo. He needs to have 140 armor in frontal hull 100 sides and 1000 HP like the hysotrical data commands.. I rest my case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame for the Lowe to be buffed only with armor in head and the gun depresion and elevation that he had 2y agoo. He needs to have 140 armor in frontal hull 100 sides and 1000 HP like the hysotrical data commands.. I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatAMX50B</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-78199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThatAMX50B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-78199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[subtle.... gj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subtle&#8230;. gj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popovic123</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-73214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Popovic123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-73214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISU, T-54, SU-122-44 and probably SU-26 (not sure) are NOT OP.
In the slightest.

It is, however, possible you don`t know how to deal with them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ISU, T-54, SU-122-44 and probably SU-26 (not sure) are NOT OP.<br />
In the slightest.</p>
<p>It is, however, possible you don`t know how to deal with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTWEmperor</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-73186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTWEmperor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-73186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Weak? How is it weak with that monster gun and ARMOR?&quot;

ROFL, that little tidbit there shows you OBVIOUSLY have not played the Lowe.

*Checks*  Yup.

Armor? XD Don&#039;t make me laugh.  Let me guess you &quot;test servered&quot; it and found it to have MONSTER ARMOR right? xD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Weak? How is it weak with that monster gun and ARMOR?&#8221;</p>
<p>ROFL, that little tidbit there shows you OBVIOUSLY have not played the Lowe.</p>
<p>*Checks*  Yup.</p>
<p>Armor? XD Don&#8217;t make me laugh.  Let me guess you &#8220;test servered&#8221; it and found it to have MONSTER ARMOR right? xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baske_74</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-72975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baske_74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-72975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this will allow for more versatility, you can now carry Ap + HE + APCR in better numbers if you want to.
this will allow me to carry more HE to finish off low health enemies or arties. and for its size it carried very little ammo-stocks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this will allow for more versatility, you can now carry Ap + HE + APCR in better numbers if you want to.<br />
this will allow me to carry more HE to finish off low health enemies or arties. and for its size it carried very little ammo-stocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbankronin</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-72750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[urbankronin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-72750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have one and find it quite effective even as it is. Of course the buff is welcome, it will open some new possibilities when you have to drive the tank more aggressively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one and find it quite effective even as it is. Of course the buff is welcome, it will open some new possibilities when you have to drive the tank more aggressively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-72739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-72739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this thing did need some sort of buff one way or another(don&#039;t own one) but I remember while being low level that I really wasn&#039;t that scared when seeing one of this things on the battlefield. Yeah the gun is good but it got penned by everything frontally and set on fire ;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this thing did need some sort of buff one way or another(don&#8217;t own one) but I remember while being low level that I really wasn&#8217;t that scared when seeing one of this things on the battlefield. Yeah the gun is good but it got penned by everything frontally and set on fire ;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazsom</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-72667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazsom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-72667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And yourself? How many times?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yourself? How many times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/30/lowe-rebalance-in-following-patches-bugfix/#comment-72646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4771#comment-72646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- KV-5 won’t be buffed like this

Yea, right. Probably, will add +180 hp, +2 traverse speed, and will balance it AGAIN with +1MM (will meet tier 10s). Yey!... That fucking type-59 can tank KV-5 from medium distance easily - its just absurd. 167 pen...Dat acc, aiming speed...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- KV-5 won’t be buffed like this</p>
<p>Yea, right. Probably, will add +180 hp, +2 traverse speed, and will balance it AGAIN with +1MM (will meet tier 10s). Yey!&#8230; That fucking type-59 can tank KV-5 from medium distance easily &#8211; its just absurd. 167 pen&#8230;Dat acc, aiming speed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
