Comments on: Soviet APC’s on T-26 chassis http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Lexi Capital complaints http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-74744 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 06:26:19 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-74744 Hi, yeah this paragraph is truly nice and I have learned lot
of things from it regarding blogging. thanks.

]]> By: anon http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-73125 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:17:32 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-73125 So did the Soviets ever experiment with half-tracks like the M2/M3 series or the Hanomag?

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-73053 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:37:36 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-73053 Yeaaaahno. The Great War “rhomboids” didn’t boast any thicker skins and were quite rifle-proof, that being something of a minimum requirement for anything to be termed an “armoured vehicle”.

It’d take a very foolish engineer indeed to design a “battle taxi” that didn’t protect its passenger from *that* much, seeing as how that’s the whole point of the exercise in the first place.

]]> By: Captian Nemo http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72900 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:17:54 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72900 I see nothing but bad reports from the front about this new armored personal carrier. They could have made it so much better.

]]> By: SdKfz252 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72891 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:10:18 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72891 Panzer I Ausf. C is super effective!

]]> By: MarkR17 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72873 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:47:16 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72873 I think that 8x57mm bullet would outright penetrate that “armor” (at least at close range and when using concentrated fire)
Since there is no exposive ammo inside, it would just kill the guys inside.

Also, try fitting 15 soldiers + driver inside while still being able to respond to surroundings..no wonder why it was cancelled.

]]> By: Sotahullu http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72812 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:18:53 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72812 Wait. We had similar project wtih BT tanks: BT-43.

http://ww2db.com/images/vehicle_bt6.jpg

Well, atleast there is no shortage of space…

]]> By: Sotahullu http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72805 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:12:30 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72805 Right. “Like shotgun against fishs in a barrel”.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72795 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:53:28 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72795 shoot that thing with a MG42, and that would scare the troops inside pretty well

]]> By: Silentstalker http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/31/soviet-apcs-on-t-26-chassis/#comment-72791 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:43:39 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4792#comment-72791 Why do you think the project was scrapped :)

]]>