Comments on: 2.11.2013

By: Ivan

Ivan — Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:33:01 +0000

“- if you sold your Superpershing for gold and want it back, you can simply buy it for the same price it was sold for in the ingame shop” Silent Stalker what do you mean? I can get back the Super Pershing for credits? If yes that’s great! I have T34 though :P

By: Zewel von Lelek a.k.a. Hustodemon [CSK]

Zewel von Lelek a.k.a. Hustodemon [CSK] — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:24:41 +0000

The Objekt 430U was a real project, although unlike it’s predecessor Objekt 430 and paralel project Objekt 432 (which became the T-64 MBT), it neither got to the prototype stage nor beyond AFAIK.

By: aivansama

aivansama — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:27:22 +0000

No it’s not. Churchill III has strip of 176 mm armor on front and you can hide weaker part by angling. Also you should not use 6-pounder on Churchill I because it sees tier 7 unlike premium-CC.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:44:48 +0000

I think they planned to but for whatever reason didn’t follow through.

WG like premium tanks to fit more as prototypes now, less mainstream, which is “the problem” that SerB is referring to.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:40:41 +0000

Church I can use the same 6 pounder and it has equal armour. They are identical.

By: R4Ging

R4Ging — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 02:29:21 +0000

Matilda II ?

Matilda IV is fine at tier 5 imo, but it needs a +/-0 MM (tier 5 max battles only).
MatildaBP seem to need a mobility buff, otherwise it should also have +/-0 MM.

By: R4Ging

R4Ging — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 02:25:14 +0000

the Churchill I can use the 6-pdr too.

I still don’t understand what the problem is though.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:50:39 +0000

- according to SerB, the problem with LL Matilda and LL Chruchill is that they are used as regular tanks in the British branch

Yet they didn’t remove them from the store after the British branch came out like they did for the 38H and B2 when the French tree came out =/

By: Blaze_Raven

Blaze_Raven — Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:31:56 +0000

The Henshell turrent on VK.4502A was once called the same the the one on Tiger II.
But they do not share the module because having different turrent ring or other excuse.

By: Blaze_Raven

Blaze_Raven — Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:29:12 +0000

The problem is that WG doesn’t want to have premium vehicle same as vehicle within tree.
And in previous FTR I thought it was stated that WZ-120 is another exception because there are not enough vehicle for Chinese tree.

But for soviet tree, there are plenty of vehicle…so they think they should not use vehicle within tree as premium vehicle?