Comments on: Ghost shells: working as intended… http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Sambu http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-77871 Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:54:29 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-77871 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC-QNHKB_0A
This is what happened to me in one battle. Truly mind blowing how something like this can happen :(

]]> By: Raaahan http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-75084 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 20:59:28 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-75084 According to Wot Tank Viewer it’s all pretty normal, there is no tank there according to the collision model….

]]> By: PeanutFly http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74973 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 17:25:18 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74973 it’s happened to me 2x in 4K battles…

]]> By: lol http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74747 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 06:54:02 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74747 the donkey willed it. donkey akbar

]]> By: omerga http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74668 Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:10:59 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74668 no way

you are talking about packet-loss – change your ISP

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74608 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:05:42 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74608 Now, what I don’t get is why he still kept shooting the same place? Didn’t he realise he couldn’t do crud while aiming at that area? I mean seriously. Perhaps after one shot you think you got unlucky but after two or even three shots I’d defnitely aim elsewhere.

PS.: I’m not supporting what the guy did or the ghost shells, just pointing out the insane logic behind shooting the same damn spot over and over again when it’s clearly not effective. I mean, seriously, you’d think people learn faster than that.

]]> By: kalawit . http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74555 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:14:13 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74555 Very rare much indeed as they said

]]> By: supertester http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74549 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:00:03 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74549 did anyone reported that guy for teamkilling ?

my experience:

i only had this on sides of french tanks, i never ghosted front or any other nation so i think it has sth to do with rly thin armour :)

]]> By: PanStraszliwego http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74509 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:45:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74509 Wow! How terrible!
But historically accurate – AMX arty has so thin armor, tat bullet passes through with no problem and isn’t inside for enough time to deal damage – just flies in and flies out and after a second it realizes that it forgot something “erm… I was supposed to damage that arty maybe?”.
Or ammo was broken. Especially that WoT Murphy’s Law says, that a shot that would bounce off/ hardly penetrate enemy, if fired randomly at ally will always damage and cause fire/ammorack him.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/02/ghost-shells-working-as-intended/#comment-74497 Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:31:19 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4863#comment-74497 If you only could understand most up voted comments under that video… Some retarded polish siemkas think that this was proof for some kind of noob protection system

]]>