Comments on: 3.11.2013

By: Unlucky_kat

Unlucky_kat — Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:59:11 +0000

definitely not enough times ;)

By: Macus Flash

Macus Flash — Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:40:27 +0000

Historical guns in WoT:
Tiger – 132mm of penetration
IS – 175mm of penetration
That will be funny.

By: Phaethon666

Phaethon666 — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:54:53 +0000

I love how my T57 reloads 4 rounds almost as fast as 1 round from the T110E4 :-P
If anything the T110E4 needs just a tiny bit of a reload buff ;)

By: bojan

bojan — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:28:03 +0000

Learn to play it better.

By: Mr. Perfect

Mr. Perfect — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:15:11 +0000

“- WG will not abandown Windows XP support: 50 percent of Russian players apparently still play on XP”

Have they mentioned what the new HD rendering will run on? If they intend to provide the HD rendering to the XP players, we’ll all be limited to DirectX 9. Hopefully they use DX 10 or 11 for the new HD rendering and use the current rendering on XP.

By: Pile of Pooh

Pile of Pooh — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:11:50 +0000

Yup. And after playing in beta for Tanks as well as alpha and beta for Planes, I can tell you they don’t listen to their testers, either. In fact, in Planes they very often did exactly the opposite of what 90%+ of the testers recommended — which explains why WoWP is such a stinking turd now.

By: Pile of Pooh

Pile of Pooh — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:01:07 +0000

“apparently, a tier 9 medium tank is considered to be equal in combat effectivity to tier 9 heavy tank,”

Apparently they haven’t driven the M46 Patton, because it’s not even equal to the other tier 9 mediums, let alone the heavies.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:20:37 +0000

Nerf a soviet tank? BAHAHA

By: T

Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:03:39 +0000

lmao amen

By: TenThousandSuns

TenThousandSuns — Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:33:08 +0000

If I wanted real tanks with real armor values I would have joined the army.

Having a good balance should take precedence over exacting historicity.