<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5.11.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-77410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-77410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- a player on losing team will (if he gets an achievement such as Top Gun) recieve the “courageous resistance” bonus (he will get the same amount of creds and XP as if he won) – this is calculated after the awards are assigned: if tank A gets 6 kills, earns 700XP and wins a battle and tank B on the other hand gets 6 kills, earns 500 XP (750 with resistance bonus), tank A will get the Top Gun (even though tank B got more XP with the CR bonus)

is this part already in the game or is this something they&#039;re considering for a future patch?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- a player on losing team will (if he gets an achievement such as Top Gun) recieve the “courageous resistance” bonus (he will get the same amount of creds and XP as if he won) – this is calculated after the awards are assigned: if tank A gets 6 kills, earns 700XP and wins a battle and tank B on the other hand gets 6 kills, earns 500 XP (750 with resistance bonus), tank A will get the Top Gun (even though tank B got more XP with the CR bonus)</p>
<p>is this part already in the game or is this something they&#8217;re considering for a future patch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stranger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-77155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stranger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-77155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yu so funni]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yu so funni</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-77142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-77142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you trolling or just stupid? 

TD =/= SPG in world of tanks. 

Even IRL they are not the same. 

And while a large number of the TD&#039;s in game are SPGs that&#039;s another matter.

On a technicality everything in the game with a gun is a SPG but most people don&#039;t see it that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you trolling or just stupid? </p>
<p>TD =/= SPG in world of tanks. </p>
<p>Even IRL they are not the same. </p>
<p>And while a large number of the TD&#8217;s in game are SPGs that&#8217;s another matter.</p>
<p>On a technicality everything in the game with a gun is a SPG but most people don&#8217;t see it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-77138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-77138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude, the WT-E-100 is a fake of the highest order. Only automatic AA gun is real as development stopped in about 1940/41.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, the WT-E-100 is a fake of the highest order. Only automatic AA gun is real as development stopped in about 1940/41.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gugushev</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-77131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gugushev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-77131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone in the German EU subforum made this:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998456_10153147206605377_2013187353_n.png]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone in the German EU subforum made this:</p>
<p><a href="https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998456_10153147206605377_2013187353_n.png" rel="nofollow">https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998456_10153147206605377_2013187353_n.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sl8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-76993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sl8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-76993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6.92 seconds on my SU-122-44 with equipment and crew. Also, it&#039;s more agile than the SU-152/122.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6.92 seconds on my SU-122-44 with equipment and crew. Also, it&#8217;s more agile than the SU-152/122.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sl8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-76992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sl8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-76992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What relevance does &quot;being amphibian&quot; have with WoT ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What relevance does &#8220;being amphibian&#8221; have with WoT ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndygoEEI</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-76982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IndygoEEI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-76982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, It&#039;s so badass looking that it would give WZ132 a run for it&#039;s money.  I think they are worried about introducing a possibly truly OP Light Tank.  PT-76 is definitely tier 7 material and it has a leg up on all other amphibian tanks for being able to actually be fast in water.  Most of the other countries Amphibian projects suck.  Walter Christie actually sold his Amphibian designs to Russia and Japan.   That&#039;s why those countries and any Soviet partners have good Amphibian tanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, It&#8217;s so badass looking that it would give WZ132 a run for it&#8217;s money.  I think they are worried about introducing a possibly truly OP Light Tank.  PT-76 is definitely tier 7 material and it has a leg up on all other amphibian tanks for being able to actually be fast in water.  Most of the other countries Amphibian projects suck.  Walter Christie actually sold his Amphibian designs to Russia and Japan.   That&#8217;s why those countries and any Soviet partners have good Amphibian tanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gugushev</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-76970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gugushev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 09:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-76970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SerB said several times that the German museums refused to provide WG with information about RU 251. Apparently there should be two existing tanks, but both seem to be missing.
They even offered reward to any player, who can find more details.

But sure, WG don&#039;t want to introduce OP German tanks, you are correct...Oh, wait...we have Waffentragers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SerB said several times that the German museums refused to provide WG with information about RU 251. Apparently there should be two existing tanks, but both seem to be missing.<br />
They even offered reward to any player, who can find more details.</p>
<p>But sure, WG don&#8217;t want to introduce OP German tanks, you are correct&#8230;Oh, wait&#8230;we have Waffentragers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/5-11-2013/#comment-76925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4986#comment-76925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see something very positive in that &quot;courageous resistance&quot; bonus. 

Here comes an XP and credits bonus for someone who played very well, even if he was in a very bad team. 
I hope it will encourage players to continue the fight even if they know they  are screwed up :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see something very positive in that &#8220;courageous resistance&#8221; bonus. </p>
<p>Here comes an XP and credits bonus for someone who played very well, even if he was in a very bad team.<br />
I hope it will encourage players to continue the fight even if they know they  are screwed up :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
