<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A stream with Veider &#8211; summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khanwulf</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khanwulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a quick question: I&#039;ve been keeping an eye out for years but have not seen any discussion of three-way fights as possible.  Did I miss something, or is this just lumped in with &quot;other battle modes done when done?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quick question: I&#8217;ve been keeping an eye out for years but have not seen any discussion of three-way fights as possible.  Did I miss something, or is this just lumped in with &#8220;other battle modes done when done?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, a tank destroyer should logically have the best gun in the game!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, a tank destroyer should logically have the best gun in the game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sl8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sl8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and you eliminate 50% of the wot playerbase because their toasters get ... toasted]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and you eliminate 50% of the wot playerbase because their toasters get &#8230; toasted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Meanwhile, the new tier 8 german TD is inferior in every way…….&quot;

Other than having a lower profile, having better camo, and having a fully rotating turret you mean. How could you even think the above is true given the advantages the new TD has?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, the new tier 8 german TD is inferior in every way…….&#8221;</p>
<p>Other than having a lower profile, having better camo, and having a fully rotating turret you mean. How could you even think the above is true given the advantages the new TD has?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;AP accuracy: 0.58&quot;

Well, that sounds like fun...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;AP accuracy: 0.58&#8243;</p>
<p>Well, that sounds like fun&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically everyone can get a British Mk. VIC.

Its called the German Tier 2 SPG with a 10.5cm gun on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically everyone can get a British Mk. VIC.</p>
<p>Its called the German Tier 2 SPG with a 10.5cm gun on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Su-152 rofl more 1,5x of T92, and it will have the TigerII glacis so 150mm = 233mm effective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Su-152 rofl more 1,5x of T92, and it will have the TigerII glacis so 150mm = 233mm effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gargamel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gargamel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The return of the Log&quot; 
soon in cinemas across the globe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The return of the Log&#8221;<br />
soon in cinemas across the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shlizer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shlizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JustNo wanted to say that now potential DMG is all dmg done to tank and dmg from non-penetrating shots.. if it will be base for that bonus all taks will get that minimum as much as they got HP.. that&#039;s not fari, couse Maus won&#039;t have to &#039;play armor&#039; and still got more bonus than 8T MT who bounced 1,5k dmg..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JustNo wanted to say that now potential DMG is all dmg done to tank and dmg from non-penetrating shots.. if it will be base for that bonus all taks will get that minimum as much as they got HP.. that&#8217;s not fari, couse Maus won&#8217;t have to &#8216;play armor&#8217; and still got more bonus than 8T MT who bounced 1,5k dmg..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonigus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/05/a-stream-with-veider-summary/#comment-77001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lonigus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4988#comment-77001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And 150k on top! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And 150k on top! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
