Comments on: 9.11.2013 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: YSUTfavrepeoria http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-81083 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:43:25 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-81083 overmatch FTW

]]> By: locastan http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80994 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:40:22 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80994 Wouldn’t that technically be a warlock? :3

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80936 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:47:53 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80936 You really should add a happymerchant.jpg to your post next time. It fits the feel of your assertion very well.

]]> By: Remger http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80648 Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:26:05 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80648 Finnaly u get it T14 IS TOO WEAK buff him i play with him a lot his penetrate is terrible, T-25 has better gun then T14 and for a lot!

]]> By: Puntar http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80406 Sun, 10 Nov 2013 22:57:31 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80406 Huh?
-
Alright APCR pen (127) on T-14 for fighting T6?
-
Do you actually know that 3 other T5 heavies have better penetration with normal, AP ammo than T-14 APCR shells?
-
T1 HT, BDR G1 and Churchill I have all better penetration with AP than APCR on T-14
-
What is rather annoying is that British T5 heavy premium Excelsior have way better APCR (144 vs 127) than T-14 despite AP pen to almost exactly the same ( 91 on UK premium vs 92 on US premium)

]]> By: ClassicFrog http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80231 Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:42:53 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80231 It doesn’t need to do any damage. It an be used to demolish buildings or reset repair of someone’s tracks. For long reload tank it is a godsend.

]]> By: ClassicFrog http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80226 Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:39:31 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80226 Or you could use it to fire at destructible environment (houses, fences, walls) to clear the way for your big gun.

I drive E-100 sometimes and apparently it also has secondary 75mm gun. It is often that something camps at opposite sides of some fragile building but I don’t want to fire at the building because of the reload time. With 75mm gun functional I could spam HE at all the obstacles covering my enemies, I could try to track enemy tanks and keep them tracked or I could finish off very low hp scouts that otherwise would cost me a very expensive shell and 16 seconds of reload.

]]> By: ClassicFrog http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80216 Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:19:20 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80216 Indeed. Doesn’t matter the length of the gun. As long as it can spam HE faster than the other guy can repair it’s going to be nice addition.
Paper thin tanks and arty won’t like it either.

]]> By: Robi2009 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80215 Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:17:01 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80215 He weighs the same as a duck?

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/09/9-11-2013/#comment-80200 Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:57:02 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5130#comment-80200 Who do you *think* he is? He’s the one guy in the dev team actually willing to put up with the ball-punchingly stupid shit the forumite fucktards clog the Q&A with.
I assume trolling is how he stays sane.

]]>