<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waffenträger auf Panzer IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harnisfechten</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-82128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harnisfechten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-82128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[real tanks have no hitpoints. it&#039;s a completely made-up arbitrary stat used for balancing. So just get over the fact that one PzIV hull has more HP than another. It doesn&#039;t matter really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>real tanks have no hitpoints. it&#8217;s a completely made-up arbitrary stat used for balancing. So just get over the fact that one PzIV hull has more HP than another. It doesn&#8217;t matter really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnorSwift</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-82031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConnorSwift]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-82031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the B-Leopard could branch off of the WT-PzIV?  Same kinda deal as the T-54 is currently, you know?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the B-Leopard could branch off of the WT-PzIV?  Same kinda deal as the T-54 is currently, you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: French Baguette Catapult</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-81068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[French Baguette Catapult]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-81068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where are these images from?
The ones from &quot;Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two&quot; look different (not that description).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are these images from?<br />
The ones from &#8220;Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two&#8221; look different (not that description).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pz IVs were used and designed to be used for almost anything you can think of during WW2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pz IVs were used and designed to be used for almost anything you can think of during WW2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lafette

His use makes sense to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lafette" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lafette</a></p>
<p>His use makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t see why it would, given recoil buffers appropriately designed for such purposes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t see why it would, given recoil buffers appropriately designed for such purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2.1m when on the level going by the drawings, and I&#039;d be quite surprised if the loaders weren&#039;t supposed to be standing on the platform around the pedestal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.1m when on the level going by the drawings, and I&#8217;d be quite surprised if the loaders weren&#8217;t supposed to be standing on the platform around the pedestal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panzer Fenris</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Panzer Fenris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’d have preferred the “ultimate hunter” solution (no autoloader, light chassis, FlaK 45) – but I suppose that’s a matter of balance considerations.&quot;

Same. Reckon the Borgward Leopard could have been a fitting endgame for the WT line. Less alpha but infinitely more sneaky. A rapier to the WT E-100&#039;s sledgehammer.

The E-100 just feels incredibly forced and shoehorned in there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d have preferred the “ultimate hunter” solution (no autoloader, light chassis, FlaK 45) – but I suppose that’s a matter of balance considerations.&#8221;</p>
<p>Same. Reckon the Borgward Leopard could have been a fitting endgame for the WT line. Less alpha but infinitely more sneaky. A rapier to the WT E-100&#8242;s sledgehammer.</p>
<p>The E-100 just feels incredibly forced and shoehorned in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman der German</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herman der German]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I now see that the Waffenträger has been abbreviated to WFT which is how Yoda says WTF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now see that the Waffenträger has been abbreviated to WFT which is how Yoda says WTF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ooorky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/10/waffentrager-auf-panzer-iv/#comment-80649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ooorky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5158#comment-80649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As my friend said: Paper can hold anything.
&quot;Hey Pasholok, we give you 1000 dollar, just defend the WTPz4. Thanks.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As my friend said: Paper can hold anything.<br />
&#8220;Hey Pasholok, we give you 1000 dollar, just defend the WTPz4. Thanks.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
