Comments on: 11.11.2013

By: blubada

blubada — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:05:42 +0000

exterminate all roaches, jews, mongoloids and niggers instead.

By: Sunshine

Sunshine — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:00:35 +0000

Serious question this one is, earlier I thought yellow viewport = 50% viewrange & red = 50m viewrange. If there’s no difference between an undamaged viewport and a yellow one, there must be a mistake in “Recon” skill description.
Or, “damaged observation device” means viewport turning red? Funny because most people interpret “damaged” as “yellow” & “destroyed” as “red”.

It’s always amusing to see info released by WG conflict with one another.

By: Ludo787

Ludo787 — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:39:38 +0000

The Navy should’ve kept building ships.

By: Stranger

Stranger — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:59:52 +0000

You really thought he was a human being? I am really disappointed…

By: Stranger

Stranger — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:57:06 +0000

Just ice for you:

http://www.betterphoto.com/uploads/processed/1305/130129064725323587.jpg

By: Stranger

Stranger — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:51:46 +0000

Jealous poor people are jealous. And don’t forget – poor. Now back to work, shitface. Or you can say goodbye to your salary.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:19 +0000

no new Soviet heavy branch is planned for now (too overpowered)

made my day thx!

By: walrus

walrus — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:23:51 +0000

agree. do not forget that WZ was not just IS-7 with IS-4′s gun.
it also had no pike nose, so angling was possible, effective armor on front was ridiculous. t had at least good mobility as 113. also, it had small silhouette and high hp pool. It was even more op than T57, we dont need it back. just buff the 113′s armor with 10-20mm extra-thickness, and its fine

By: Xelos

Xelos — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:50:17 +0000

I’d rather have a player with 4-5k battles at >50% WR versus a 20-30k battles player at <50% WR.

By: Commander John Shepard

Commander John Shepard — Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:51:17 +0000

We’ll bang, ok?