<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upcoming Soviet T9 MT &#8211; Object 430 V2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drackelon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-82531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drackelon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-82531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[btw, all tanks can be very good, the big problem is the &quot;player&quot; .

if the player knows how to play with the tank, ok, if not, It&#039;s easy to criticize !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, all tanks can be very good, the big problem is the &#8220;player&#8221; .</p>
<p>if the player knows how to play with the tank, ok, if not, It&#8217;s easy to criticize !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thx, but i guess my argument is still more valuable than your pointless and useless answer. About my feeling, i just think that this game is going more and more shitty time after time. But after all, and thanks to peoples who are as clever as you, SerB shouldn&#039;t be worried about his bank account]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx, but i guess my argument is still more valuable than your pointless and useless answer. About my feeling, i just think that this game is going more and more shitty time after time. But after all, and thanks to peoples who are as clever as you, SerB shouldn&#8217;t be worried about his bank account</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L0rd_0f_War</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L0rd_0f_War]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really commend guys who learn and master these rear turreted meds with almost no Gun depression. I don&#039;t think I can be very effective with such a tank.

BTW, any of you think this will in any way outshine the T54? or Wz120?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really commend guys who learn and master these rear turreted meds with almost no Gun depression. I don&#8217;t think I can be very effective with such a tank.</p>
<p>BTW, any of you think this will in any way outshine the T54? or Wz120?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a better idea, just disable all comments, less than 10% are worth reading...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a better idea, just disable all comments, less than 10% are worth reading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leedar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leedar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like that this is rear-turreted; I can bathe in the whine. :-D

I don&#039;t know if I am any good (WR would say not, although I managed ace tanker in the 2nd battle) but it is interesting to play the A-44 for the aforementioned reasons, compared to the completely generic T-43. Most fun manoeuvre is of course the drive-by, using your speed to race past an unsuspecting tank and shooting his side for the meaty 300 average damage. Thanks to the thick frontal beak armour, with high top speed and agility, it can ram some lighter tanks quite well.

I&#039;m guessing the 416 plays differently due to terrible armour and limited traverse, but TD-level camouflage, small size, moderately accurate gun with decent pen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that this is rear-turreted; I can bathe in the whine. :-D</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I am any good (WR would say not, although I managed ace tanker in the 2nd battle) but it is interesting to play the A-44 for the aforementioned reasons, compared to the completely generic T-43. Most fun manoeuvre is of course the drive-by, using your speed to race past an unsuspecting tank and shooting his side for the meaty 300 average damage. Thanks to the thick frontal beak armour, with high top speed and agility, it can ram some lighter tanks quite well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing the 416 plays differently due to terrible armour and limited traverse, but TD-level camouflage, small size, moderately accurate gun with decent pen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffery</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can easily find the leaker.

All they have to do is search for someone with a tank that has the names of all those crew members. It will be unique.

If you want to leak info make sure you censor everything that can be unique _in_combination_.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can easily find the leaker.</p>
<p>All they have to do is search for someone with a tank that has the names of all those crew members. It will be unique.</p>
<p>If you want to leak info make sure you censor everything that can be unique _in_combination_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trroo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trroo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[looks like the 2nd t54 gun (which no one uses, the one with 219 pen)... so it will probably have exactly the same gun selection as t-54. Lets hope they dont fuck with everyone again by adding or changing a letter in the guns name and calling it a completely new gun needed to be researched again...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like the 2nd t54 gun (which no one uses, the one with 219 pen)&#8230; so it will probably have exactly the same gun selection as t-54. Lets hope they dont fuck with everyone again by adding or changing a letter in the guns name and calling it a completely new gun needed to be researched again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimitri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Massive Turret Weak Spot
&gt;Massive 

I don&#039;t think you know what that word means.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Massive Turret Weak Spot<br />
&gt;Massive </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you know what that word means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takeda</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takeda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, no more US tanks :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, no more US tanks :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hornet331</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/11/upcoming-soviet-t9-mt-object-430-v2/#comment-81448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hornet331]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5189#comment-81448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not with only 45mm side armor. If it would have the same as T44 or even more it would be &quot;ok&quot;, but 45mm gets overmatchted by anything. (even when you add the 20mm for the tracks as spaced armor)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not with only 45mm side armor. If it would have the same as T44 or even more it would be &#8220;ok&#8221;, but 45mm gets overmatchted by anything. (even when you add the 20mm for the tracks as spaced armor)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
