Comments on: Object 430 and 430V2

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 17 Nov 2013 01:13:14 +0000

Looking forward to hear SerB’s “how terrible” and don’t plays on TV

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:57:57 +0000

what is up the background of the picture? is that an upcoming map?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:16:26 +0000

Please do not ruin the Leo1 with 105 HESH rounds…

By: R4Ging

R4Ging — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:36:05 +0000

because tanks fit in your pocket, right ? lol

By: Brodan

Brodan — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:52:40 +0000

boring? don’t play it. case closed

By: rossmum

rossmum — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:37:20 +0000

Get in my garage you goddamn beautiful thing.

By: Chehaut

Chehaut — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:33:50 +0000

Object 430 is not a clone, I think it is a very interesting tank, which was way ahead of its time when it was build. Also it was the start of one of the best Soviet mbt’s during the cold war: T-64

By: EcchiRevenge

EcchiRevenge — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:21:23 +0000

While not on city maps; Foch155 still has a lot of camo AND speed to go places.

By: nebsif (EU)

nebsif (EU) — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:45:50 +0000

lol even teh prototype obj 140 had two plane stabilization IRL while patton had none, its just that WG is buffing those obese tanks how ever they can so they will compete.

By: Leedar

Leedar — Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:30:15 +0000

Rear turret seems to typically allow for mounting more powerful guns; perhaps the 430 var. II will have the tier 10 gun, a la Leopard PTA or Centurion Mk 7 (reduced RoF, etc.). This would keep it inline with the other tanks of this branch, having high powered guns for their tier (aside from A-43).

Also, it would be a bit odd if they have bad terrain resistance; the hallmark of this line is very low terrain resistance and reticule bloom, and high traverse speed.