Comments on: 13.11.2013

By: Harnisfechten

Harnisfechten — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:07:49 +0000

and it wouldn’t be OP because A) paper thin sides means no angling, weak to flanking, and weak to arty. and B) no mantlet, with an area around the gun that isn’t really sloped, so it has a weakspot.

By: Harnisfechten

Harnisfechten — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:06:50 +0000

decent for a heavy tank. 30kph offroad speed and 48kph road speed. It would be similar to the T110E5 mobility

By: Harnisfechten

Harnisfechten — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:21:54 +0000

lol what exactly gave you the impression that I was being arrogant??? So me complaining about WG is being a “know-it-all”? alright….if you say so.

And you think I’m “riled up”? Is that just a way of you saying “umadbro”? lol….

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:01:46 +0000

“Staff reshuffle and firings all around” was my first thought after reading “internal WG RU thing”… but I may just be overly cynical about modern business practices. (haha yeah right.)

Anyways…
“- you will be able to add camouflage to roadwheels too in the HD client”

Huh. Read the Osprey booklet on WW2 vehicle camo some time ago and it mentioned this. Said the “pinwheel” effect when moving rather defeated the purpose, plus the roadwheels and lower hull invariably got caked with mud, dust and what have you in short order anyway which is why most never bothered even trying in the first place.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:55:49 +0000

…you’re not the regular one are you? Not enough pointless obscenities for that.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:54:03 +0000

AFAIK the B1 hull gun had no lateral traverse at all, the driver (also its gunner) aimed it by pivoting the hull. The high-precision transmission system this required was such a pain to keep in a working condition that the “ter” version planned to junk it and add some traverse (like 5 degrees or less in iehter direction IIRC) instead.

By: Chris Wo

Chris Wo — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:24:40 +0000

Typical authoritarian Belorussian customer service rep? A+ for legendary customer service, Bravo

By: Tankcommander

Tankcommander — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:08:19 +0000

Well, no need to visit this blog anymore then.

By: IllustriousBMG

IllustriousBMG — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:53:21 +0000

I suspect that the reason why everyone is all over you is because you sound like a pretentious, know-it-all sack of fecal matter who thinks he’s SO SMART compared to the average ”FIRST”-spamming FTR commenter.

If this bothers you, you should a. stop being an arrogant fuckwad or b. in case you’re actually a decent person, stop sounding like an arrogant fuckwad. If it doesn’t, then stop getting so riled up over people getting pissed at you and just laugh about it.

By: Harnisfechten

Harnisfechten — Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:52:18 +0000

yeah, that’s good customer relations alright.

What other successful company tells people “if you have a problem, fuck off”?

Most companies try to listen to their customers and solve problems. WG should be doing everything in their power to stop people from leaving to play WT, not saying “fine, leave, fuck off”