<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 18.11.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThaElf</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-87542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThaElf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-87542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone didn&#039;t read FTR for few months closely enough.

WG admitted, that for winning rows your BT ( Battle Tier ) goes up while being bad you are put to lower BT. It was part of question series slowly rolled out. So it does add up that being a good player you get harder matches being more low tier in matches.

No, not serious, punctuality from WG cannot be denied.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone didn&#8217;t read FTR for few months closely enough.</p>
<p>WG admitted, that for winning rows your BT ( Battle Tier ) goes up while being bad you are put to lower BT. It was part of question series slowly rolled out. So it does add up that being a good player you get harder matches being more low tier in matches.</p>
<p>No, not serious, punctuality from WG cannot be denied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 18.11.2013 &#124; WoTRomania</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-87522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[18.11.2013 &#124; WoTRomania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-87522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sursa [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sursa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenIDUser31</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OpenIDUser31]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- there are apparently no curreng German historical candidates to replace unhistorical guns on some German tanks

quick grammar correction &quot;Current&quot; from Curreng]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- there are apparently no curreng German historical candidates to replace unhistorical guns on some German tanks</p>
<p>quick grammar correction &#8220;Current&#8221; from Curreng</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogopogo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ogopogo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 02:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- there are no data from Bovington available on TOG-2R and TOG-3 projects

Really wargamming. The British archives are a good place to look to.

Development of the heavy tank TOGS 2 Series: Models TOG 2, TOG 2* and TOG 2R
http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/details?Uri=C11066305]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- there are no data from Bovington available on TOG-2R and TOG-3 projects</p>
<p>Really wargamming. The British archives are a good place to look to.</p>
<p>Development of the heavy tank TOGS 2 Series: Models TOG 2, TOG 2* and TOG 2R<br />
<a href="http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/details?Uri=C11066305" rel="nofollow">http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/details?Uri=C11066305</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinez</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I WANT this tank too. FFS, this is what grinding crappanther worth!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WANT this tank too. FFS, this is what grinding crappanther worth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sigel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 23:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that link for transfer from VTC server to SEA server. But according to some moderator on WOT VTC forums, the transfer is not going to happen any time soon. May be VTC is playing &quot;hide and seek&quot; with player :-&#124;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that link for transfer from VTC server to SEA server. But according to some moderator on WOT VTC forums, the transfer is not going to happen any time soon. May be VTC is playing &#8220;hide and seek&#8221; with player :-|</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor_Hammerschlag</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thor_Hammerschlag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dont play it. Its so incredible bad currently, i even guess it will get a buff in the far future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont play it. Its so incredible bad currently, i even guess it will get a buff in the far future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-3_cannon

Might be more then the stated 1500m/s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-3_cannon" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-3_cannon</a></p>
<p>Might be more then the stated 1500m/s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- the reason the King Tiger had 120mm LFP in the first place (unhistorical) is that a part of data from Kubinka stated 100mm, another part stated 120mm, SerB states it’s completely possible different single vehicles had 120mm LFP

This, I suppose, is possible. If the factory ran out of 100mm plates and had a 120mm plate just sitting around so they just cut it and slapped it on to get the chassis off the jig.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- the reason the King Tiger had 120mm LFP in the first place (unhistorical) is that a part of data from Kubinka stated 100mm, another part stated 120mm, SerB states it’s completely possible different single vehicles had 120mm LFP</p>
<p>This, I suppose, is possible. If the factory ran out of 100mm plates and had a 120mm plate just sitting around so they just cut it and slapped it on to get the chassis off the jig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Siewert</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/18/18-11-2013/#comment-86792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Siewert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5399#comment-86792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- there are not enough data that would suggest the 75mm KwK 44 L/70 is more powerful than the 75mm KwK 42, that’s why they have idential performance in game. Its pen won’t be buffed (SS: yes, I tried to find some more data on that model, but there is very little indeed)&quot;

From taking one thing out of the Spielberger-Books into account, namely the missing muzzle break on the KwK44 and 44/1, it could be derived, that the 44-Series could fire subcalibre shells, which would be impossible for the KwK42, as it is equipped with a muzzle break. Considering the higher muzzle velocity of subcalibre shells, a higher pen and potential higher possibility of critical damage would be thinkable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- there are not enough data that would suggest the 75mm KwK 44 L/70 is more powerful than the 75mm KwK 42, that’s why they have idential performance in game. Its pen won’t be buffed (SS: yes, I tried to find some more data on that model, but there is very little indeed)&#8221;</p>
<p>From taking one thing out of the Spielberger-Books into account, namely the missing muzzle break on the KwK44 and 44/1, it could be derived, that the 44-Series could fire subcalibre shells, which would be impossible for the KwK42, as it is equipped with a muzzle break. Considering the higher muzzle velocity of subcalibre shells, a higher pen and potential higher possibility of critical damage would be thinkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
