<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superheavy Japanese tanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even tho, KV-5 is just the one shitty R2D2. Imagine having 2 or 3 of them and it just being impossible to properly hide]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even tho, KV-5 is just the one shitty R2D2. Imagine having 2 or 3 of them and it just being impossible to properly hide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K1ll3rm4x</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K1ll3rm4x]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 22:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude I&#039;m hell far from whining. Just stating the obvious.
Most german tanks would stand fine getting -1 Tier but having their historical equip.
SS stated this as well some while ago.

But I dont really mind how it is at the moment since its a game after all with just SOME historical backgrounds.
Its just how WG deals with it. Referring to historical accuracy when they are in the mood of it (or at least it looks like) and arguing with gaming balance on the other end at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude I&#8217;m hell far from whining. Just stating the obvious.<br />
Most german tanks would stand fine getting -1 Tier but having their historical equip.<br />
SS stated this as well some while ago.</p>
<p>But I dont really mind how it is at the moment since its a game after all with just SOME historical backgrounds.<br />
Its just how WG deals with it. Referring to historical accuracy when they are in the mood of it (or at least it looks like) and arguing with gaming balance on the other end at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazomir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazomir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KV-5 is one of my favorite tanks. But believe me, learning how to play it was painfull. But now the gameplay feels like a breeze.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KV-5 is one of my favorite tanks. But believe me, learning how to play it was painfull. But now the gameplay feels like a breeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westonbirt_EU</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westonbirt_EU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s no good to see &quot;nations&quot;, you gotta see &quot;lines&quot;.

In the Germans, you have the Porsche Line,  the Henschel Line, the Supermedium Line and the DB Line. The Americans have the Heavy Line, Medium Line, Auto Line. The French have the AMX-13 line, the Infantry line and the AMX 50 line, the British have the Infantry Line, the Cruiser Line, the Unimediums and the Uniheavies. The Chinese have the Light line, the Medium Line and the Heavy Line. Each of these lines is consistent amongst itself, and not necessarily similar to others. The American Medium line is much closer to the Unimedium line than to the USA Auto line, which resembles more the AMX 50 line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s no good to see &#8220;nations&#8221;, you gotta see &#8220;lines&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the Germans, you have the Porsche Line,  the Henschel Line, the Supermedium Line and the DB Line. The Americans have the Heavy Line, Medium Line, Auto Line. The French have the AMX-13 line, the Infantry line and the AMX 50 line, the British have the Infantry Line, the Cruiser Line, the Unimediums and the Uniheavies. The Chinese have the Light line, the Medium Line and the Heavy Line. Each of these lines is consistent amongst itself, and not necessarily similar to others. The American Medium line is much closer to the Unimedium line than to the USA Auto line, which resembles more the AMX 50 line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazomir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazomir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets just say nobody ever has made a moveable 200 ton tank, except the germans.
If thats not a feat of engineering i dont know what it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets just say nobody ever has made a moveable 200 ton tank, except the germans.<br />
If thats not a feat of engineering i dont know what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExoNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExoNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nigga please, the KV-4 has armor that can be penned even by tier 7 but the secret lies in angling the whole damn thing! I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s the fact that you don&#039;t need to grind KV-5 and get through the hell of learning by mistakes that people whine so much about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nigga please, the KV-4 has armor that can be penned even by tier 7 but the secret lies in angling the whole damn thing! I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the fact that you don&#8217;t need to grind KV-5 and get through the hell of learning by mistakes that people whine so much about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExoNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExoNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is in the game but that&#039;s probably because there are no pesky planes in WoT.... :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is in the game but that&#8217;s probably because there are no pesky planes in WoT&#8230;. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExoNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExoNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Yea way to point out one of the only exceptions. And yes, it was carefully tought out. The sheer fact of it being the heaviest AFV in WW2 to be operated indicates how much tought was put in it.
&gt;200 ton tank
&gt; indicates how much tought was put in it.

Wat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Yea way to point out one of the only exceptions. And yes, it was carefully tought out. The sheer fact of it being the heaviest AFV in WW2 to be operated indicates how much tought was put in it.<br />
&gt;200 ton tank<br />
&gt; indicates how much tought was put in it.</p>
<p>Wat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExoNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExoNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then there is hope ;__;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there is hope ;__;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazingchickens</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/19/superheavy-japanese-tanks/#comment-87462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amazingchickens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5444#comment-87462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well he wasn&#039;t talking about German cities SdKfz (more like the incendiary bombing of say Tokyo or Kobe), but i see what you are saying.
Fun fact: Winston Churchill personally gave the go-ahead for the Dresden bombing raid, a raid that was done for the sole purpose of creating mass civilian casualties, due to the city being a center for refugees at the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well he wasn&#8217;t talking about German cities SdKfz (more like the incendiary bombing of say Tokyo or Kobe), but i see what you are saying.<br />
Fun fact: Winston Churchill personally gave the go-ahead for the Dresden bombing raid, a raid that was done for the sole purpose of creating mass civilian casualties, due to the city being a center for refugees at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
