<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PaK 43 L/71 88mm autoloader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you mean T-72, &quot;T72&quot; would be some old Murrican experimental thing. Also it crams 125mm&#039;s of gun (and separated ammunition) into some 41 tons of &quot;budget&quot; tank so I&#039;d say some inconvenience in the design is excusable...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean T-72, &#8220;T72&#8243; would be some old Murrican experimental thing. Also it crams 125mm&#8217;s of gun (and separated ammunition) into some 41 tons of &#8220;budget&#8221; tank so I&#8217;d say some inconvenience in the design is excusable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still better than the *original* heavy siege artillery, which had RoF like twice a day or so. Apparently one master gunner who instead managed to coax three out of one such a bombard was obliged to make a pilgrimage to Rome to prove he hadn&#039;t made a pact with the Devil...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still better than the *original* heavy siege artillery, which had RoF like twice a day or so. Apparently one master gunner who instead managed to coax three out of one such a bombard was obliged to make a pilgrimage to Rome to prove he hadn&#8217;t made a pact with the Devil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missingturret</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[missingturret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[88L71 is a much better credit grinder than 105, but I sometimes miss the alpha and the brawling capacity... That said, gimme the autoloader! Nao!! The 88L71 could pwn with one of those...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>88L71 is a much better credit grinder than 105, but I sometimes miss the alpha and the brawling capacity&#8230; That said, gimme the autoloader! Nao!! The 88L71 could pwn with one of those&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinez</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[100% crew + vents = 5,15s reload :3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% crew + vents = 5,15s reload :3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haren</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 22:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I drive my E-50 with stock 88mm L/71, and it&#039;s not THAT bad tbh. Sure, it needs gold (and often even gold dinges - 234 [?] pen says hello), but it&#039;s certainly not a painful grind. On tier IX med.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drive my E-50 with stock 88mm L/71, and it&#8217;s not THAT bad tbh. Sure, it needs gold (and often even gold dinges &#8211; 234 [?] pen says hello), but it&#8217;s certainly not a painful grind. On tier IX med.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daigensui</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daigensui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, it technically fired AP only. The tungsten round was added as APCR due to the material.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it technically fired AP only. The tungsten round was added as APCR due to the material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no it would take an extremely long time to load. like 10mins +]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no it would take an extremely long time to load. like 10mins +</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chiel vd Sande</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chiel vd Sande]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any information about the rate of fire compared to human loader for the 88mm?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any information about the rate of fire compared to human loader for the 88mm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^^Same here. 88 is just awesome on JP.....slightly more pen than 105mm.....accuracy is awesome and RoF &lt;3 it shoots like every 5,5 seconds...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^Same here. 88 is just awesome on JP&#8230;..slightly more pen than 105mm&#8230;..accuracy is awesome and RoF &lt;3 it shoots like every 5,5 seconds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixxxie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/20/pak-43-l71-88mm-autoloader/#comment-87497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nixxxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5469#comment-87497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree partially with both sides. Fitting this IRL would have been absurd because of many reasons.
Still, in the game it could work if given HEAT as stock shell. There are some special cases, like Konisch, which technically fired APCR only (and was partially smoothbore, what an abomination! - the moment SerB knows this, he removes it from the game).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree partially with both sides. Fitting this IRL would have been absurd because of many reasons.<br />
Still, in the game it could work if given HEAT as stock shell. There are some special cases, like Konisch, which technically fired APCR only (and was partially smoothbore, what an abomination! &#8211; the moment SerB knows this, he removes it from the game).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
