<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T37, possible new US light tank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stronk Tenk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stronk Tenk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, correct post here: http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/302362-why-do-light-tanks-not-have-better-view-range/page__st__40__pid__5988452#entry5988452]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, correct post here: <a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/302362-why-do-light-tanks-not-have-better-view-range/page__st__40__pid__5988452#entry5988452" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/302362-why-do-light-tanks-not-have-better-view-range/page__st__40__pid__5988452#entry5988452</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stronk Tenk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stronk Tenk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They do not have a significant advantage anymore since 8.6. Their camo got nerfed hard.

http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/302362-why-do-light-tanks-not-have-better-view-range/page__st__40#top]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do not have a significant advantage anymore since 8.6. Their camo got nerfed hard.</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/302362-why-do-light-tanks-not-have-better-view-range/page__st__40#top" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/302362-why-do-light-tanks-not-have-better-view-range/page__st__40#top</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Txus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Txus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apolloF117 .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apolloF117 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 04:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[still want an M551 Sheridan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still want an M551 Sheridan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leedar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leedar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 03:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I would prefer normal matchmaking, and I do believe it is WG holding on to a design anachronism for the sake of laziness, most scouts do have a significant advantage in camouflage and size, which gives them an edge in spotting in forward positions without being spotted back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I would prefer normal matchmaking, and I do believe it is WG holding on to a design anachronism for the sake of laziness, most scouts do have a significant advantage in camouflage and size, which gives them an edge in spotting in forward positions without being spotted back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMSBC</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMSBC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How terrible…


don&#039;t play T37 TANK]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How terrible…</p>
<p>don&#8217;t play T37 TANK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Moynihan (Polandballs World of Tanks News)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Moynihan (Polandballs World of Tanks News)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least credit /u/buck-o from reddit where you got these from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least credit /u/buck-o from reddit where you got these from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron_Tsunami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron_Tsunami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOUR!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOUR!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muerte92</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muerte92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 23:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would nicely lead to the T95.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would nicely lead to the T95.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin4x4</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/21/t37-possible-new-us-light-tank/#comment-87755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martin4x4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5515#comment-87755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scout MM should have been cancelled a long time ago]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scout MM should have been cancelled a long time ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
