Comments on: 22.11.2013

By: Drakko

Drakko — Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:40:34 +0000

That’s true for ISU up until and including the moment you press the trigger. Afterwards everyone on the map and the space station MIR know where you are and what you’ve had for breakfast :).

For the RHM…I was staring at one in the middle of the road while reloading and it went PUF! Vanish! I could almost hear that NOD stealth field coming up :D

By: TankaTed

TankaTed — Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:31:37 +0000

PZ 35 is fine how? The PZ B2 sees tier 4 max and has twice the armor/hp pool, and this thing sees mostly tier 5 with a tier 2 gun. How is it doing fine? I think it should see tier 4 max, but I know it will never happen.

By: Septfox Malkier

Septfox Malkier — Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:23:24 +0000

“- SerB is fine with the performance of old premium/reward tanks, such as the Ram II, Matilda LL, T14, A32 and Panzer S35″

I invite SerB to play the Matilda LL for 50 games and see just how “fine” it is to be penetrated by every tank that has come out since, while having to be laser-precise to have a chance (yes a “chance”, implying not guaranteed) to pen them in return. And god help you if an Excelsior or AT-2 appears that you need to try and solo, since the premium ammo is so unbelievably shit.

Interestingly, I have none of the same issues in the Excelsior. It’s amazing what 5 extra penetration can do when battling nearly everything in the tier spread, and the premium ammunition is actually worth purchasing to target heavy weakpoints with (e.g. AT-2 cupola when getting around them is impossible).

Seriously, that’s all the tank needs; bring the gun penetration up to on-par with the other tier 5 premiums. Then it would be “fine”. It’s not like the tank is massively powerful in any other respect aside from gun depression, which is negated somewhat by the distinctly average mantlet/turret face thickness.

As for the WT E-100′s camo rating, why are people bitching about it? Did they really think that having a ridiculously powerful gun sticking out the top of the hull wouldn’t have any downsides? Game balance aside, it’s *taller than the Maus is*. Camouflage rating is at least partially based on silhouette height, why would anyone expect it to have better camo than a smaller tank does?

Sometimes…sometimes I see why Serb trolls as much as he does…

By: martinez

martinez — Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:00:42 +0000

-(SS: its implementation into Jagdpanther is thus not excluded)
Good thing I never sell this hot babe….

By: martinez

martinez — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 23:58:56 +0000

+/-1 MM is useless and boring, since you won’t ever get epic medal like Halonen / Oskin / Tamada / Orlik

Killing tank +4 tier higher than you is epic

By: TheCrusaderGr

TheCrusaderGr — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:37:43 +0000

it was about time that another tank wold have better cammo factor then the ISU with his stallinioum cloacking device
also RhB WT is pretty small and stealthy so it is logical after the new td like of the germas are counting on good cammo factors( some of them at least that are not huge)

By: bojan

bojan — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:09:03 +0000

Welcome to some challenge. Killing tank 2 tiers better then you is IMO quite a satisfaction.

By: Sir_Arvondor

Sir_Arvondor — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:56:26 +0000

- SerB states that the developers never planned to introduce +/-1 MM spread, because it’s not needed – for example in such a case the T-34/76 couldn’t face the Tiger

THAT’S their excuse for having a fuck-awful MM system? *sigh

By: Medjed

Medjed — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:27:44 +0000

You are damn right….like it’s not enough that Google is trying to force that shitty google+ down our throats now WG is doing the same thing with WoWP…..if i wanted to play freking airplanes i would play them no matter you advertised it or not…..i tried it in CB when i got the key, played few battles uninstalled it and never played it again….game maybe changed a lot, but still i prefer tanks….

By: Sweedish_Gunner

Sweedish_Gunner — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:21:33 +0000

- camo factor of the WT E-100 and RhB WT won’t be commented on

Yeah the camouflage on the WT E 100 is really bad (obviously) and the camouflage on the Rhm is absolutely stupid, I spotted an ISU-152 yesterday before the Rhm so it’s better than that, and we all know how the ISU has a cloaking device off a Nod Stealth tank…