Comments on: Ha-Go original drawings

By: SMSBC

SMSBC — Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:10:30 +0000

知道我这的很多资料它都是汉字的

By: NaharArkwing_SEA

NaharArkwing_SEA — Sat, 23 Nov 2013 05:21:37 +0000

Wow..
Even better than my own illustrations really. =,=;

By: LeoXiao92 .

LeoXiao92 . — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:14:27 +0000

不好意思，「百化」應該是「白話文」

By: LeoXiao92 .

LeoXiao92 . — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:10:57 +0000

以前日本人沒有文字，所以藉用了漢字，而且寫的都是文言文。發明假名之後日文才有了點兒百化文的意思，到了現在逐漸這樣。但是更深刻、專業的話題（如坦克藍圖）還是需要很多漢字。二戰後日本本來要廢除漢字，但發現不好使。

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:58:57 +0000

…were they *intentionally* imitating the art style of Ye Olden Times or something? Because in that regard those could be from, idk, the 15th century…

By: MrRzepa

MrRzepa — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:08:24 +0000

I sometimes sketch something in this way in my notebook :) I can build a tank!

By: Leedar

Leedar — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:02:16 +0000

These are really ‘illustrations’ rather than technical drawings, probably not done with any tools (besides a simple ruler) or grid paper. It might recall orthographic projection simply because it isn’t ‘in perspective’. For instance, you’d expect the tracks to be parallel, but in both of the drawings they taper to the tank’s rear. This might be because of the artist’s skill limitations, or intentional to be easier to spot parts of the tank, unlike with a technical drawing that could be hard to quickly interpret.

In Wot Tank Viewer you can see that in orthographic view parts of the tank that are receding into the background stay the same size instead of shrinking as with normal perspective. Load up the TOG and view slightly to the side and above the front; the body of the tank appears to expand towards the rear.

By: Konata

Konata — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:52:36 +0000

Ni hao from Serbia buddy :3

By: Crate

Crate — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:15:45 +0000

Is there a reason the scheme reminds me of the orthgraphic view on Wot tank viewer?

By: SMSBC

SMSBC — Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:11:04 +0000

日语里有一些汉字，所以能看懂。感觉年代越早，汉字越多，仅此而已。