<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 25.11.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Listy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Fletcher&quot; even... whoops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fletcher&#8221; even&#8230; whoops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Listy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. every country had bad tanks, Britain wasn&#039;t anything special. But for some reason everyone focuses on British failures more than other nations.

I wouldn&#039;t say Britain had more failures than any other country though. Of course if its not German then its a crap tank according to the majority.

PS: Well done on reading Chamberlain, he&#039;s been overshadowed by Flether these days, Its normally only those above a certain age who know of him ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. every country had bad tanks, Britain wasn&#8217;t anything special. But for some reason everyone focuses on British failures more than other nations.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say Britain had more failures than any other country though. Of course if its not German then its a crap tank according to the majority.</p>
<p>PS: Well done on reading Chamberlain, he&#8217;s been overshadowed by Flether these days, Its normally only those above a certain age who know of him ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokapokami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pokapokami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to find out more about Mr Orlik check out http://archive.worldhistoria.com/cockroach-versus-panzers--first-ww-ii-tank-aces_topic26209.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to find out more about Mr Orlik check out <a href="http://archive.worldhistoria.com/cockroach-versus-panzers--first-ww-ii-tank-aces_topic26209.html" rel="nofollow">http://archive.worldhistoria.com/cockroach-versus-panzers&#8211;first-ww-ii-tank-aces_topic26209.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arcanum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arcanum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T71 much stronger than AMX 13-75? “How terrible…”

This is really silly - T71 is better in EVERY aspect... Absurd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T71 much stronger than AMX 13-75? “How terrible…”</p>
<p>This is really silly &#8211; T71 is better in EVERY aspect&#8230; Absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinderschlager</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinderschlager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Serb in charge of balancing?

dark days are ahead, dark days indeed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serb in charge of balancing?</p>
<p>dark days are ahead, dark days indeed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ooorky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ooorky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah it&#039;s upgraded, reworked, but the point is it&#039;s a COMMONLY USED engine, every game has physics engine nowadays, even Tetris...
So it isn&#039;t something unique, like they want us to believe.

WoT gets Dx11 renderer next year, WT gets it in the next month (but I&#039;ll use the new OpenGL renderer, more fps with the same settings)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it&#8217;s upgraded, reworked, but the point is it&#8217;s a COMMONLY USED engine, every game has physics engine nowadays, even Tetris&#8230;<br />
So it isn&#8217;t something unique, like they want us to believe.</p>
<p>WoT gets Dx11 renderer next year, WT gets it in the next month (but I&#8217;ll use the new OpenGL renderer, more fps with the same settings)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brynky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brynky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, France had the &quot;good luck&quot; to have become a major European power long before that war, and the misfortune to be next to Germans yet divided from &quot;the only people who hated their guts&quot; aka their allies the Brits, by a channel. On the other hand, that nice little moat served the Brits well, giving them time to actually survive the onslaught, and later come back. If the Germans had easy ccess to Britain that early in the war, the Poles would still be under Russians, or would not exist at all, and the Unified Europe would have arrived cca 1950, only as the &quot;Europeiche Reich&quot; :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, France had the &#8220;good luck&#8221; to have become a major European power long before that war, and the misfortune to be next to Germans yet divided from &#8220;the only people who hated their guts&#8221; aka their allies the Brits, by a channel. On the other hand, that nice little moat served the Brits well, giving them time to actually survive the onslaught, and later come back. If the Germans had easy ccess to Britain that early in the war, the Poles would still be under Russians, or would not exist at all, and the Unified Europe would have arrived cca 1950, only as the &#8220;Europeiche Reich&#8221; :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crate</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing a custom skin won&#039;t be able to fix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing a custom skin won&#8217;t be able to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have books by both actually. And some of the designs were really really bad. Some were just poorly thought out and some were bad because of operational issues due to climate issues that took time to solve.

I know that they weren&#039;t all bad (been reading about British tanks a lot lately) but I had to rub it in a little. A lot of the tanks had great features only to be let down by different issues for different tanks. Every country had their embarrassing tank problems some just show up in books more often then others. =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have books by both actually. And some of the designs were really really bad. Some were just poorly thought out and some were bad because of operational issues due to climate issues that took time to solve.</p>
<p>I know that they weren&#8217;t all bad (been reading about British tanks a lot lately) but I had to rub it in a little. A lot of the tanks had great features only to be let down by different issues for different tanks. Every country had their embarrassing tank problems some just show up in books more often then others. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodosius</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/25/25-11-2013/#comment-88374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theodosius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5620#comment-88374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leopard size with Patton armor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leopard size with Patton armor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
