Comments on: 28.11.2013

By: tronicson

tronicson — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:22:31 +0000

read your words and apply!

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:07:29 +0000

When turret explosions will get implemented it’ll be interesting to stay by an ammoracking Maus.

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:00:16 +0000

That would kill the server

By: Borat Nievski

Borat Nievski — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:30:01 +0000

_______________________

Is this line good enough?

By: LiquidInferno

LiquidInferno — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:48:23 +0000

“it’s possible the T71 will recieve an optional hull” I like the sound of that!
also:
“apparently, visual camo net (SS: a tank with visible camo net covering it) will NOT be implemented”
That news sucks, was always hoping to get that. Then again WG has been known to say things like this and then change their minds. With cosmetic additions supposedly coming I can easily see the eventuality of a visual camo net.

By: Z.G.

Z.G. — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:26:50 +0000

“- captured German KV-1 (Pz.Kfpw.KV-1 756(r)) will be armed with the 75mm L/43 KwK 40 with the muzzle brake from the L/48 model”

Nice! I wonder where they’ll put it? Premium?
BTW I think it’s Pz.Kpfw, isn’t it?

I wonder if we’ll get GuP’s voice in the 8.10.

By: Stronk Tenk

Stronk Tenk — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:22:59 +0000

I know.

By: styles

styles — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:21:26 +0000

The sturer emil doesn’t have fantastic superstructure armor that will let it bounce shots when it’s hull down, that’s why it doesn’t seem overpowered to you. You’re ignoring one part of the problem …the fantastic armor of the STB1 turret. In world of tanks, generally only heavy tanks can use the hull down tactic well. Medium tanks either don’t have the turret armor or they don’t have good gun depression. The STB has both AND an incredible DPM, very good aim time, good accuracy and heavy tank penetration. Not to mention much better mobility than a heavy.

By: styles

styles — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:15:21 +0000

Doubtful. It’s hard to understand how wargaming makes its decisions on what to nerf after a test server run. A lot of the time they nerf things that don’t need it, just in case they might turn out to be stronger on the live server, but then other times they leave things that seem obviously overpowered.

I played on the last test server and the new tier 8 and 9 german TDs seemed fine, but then they nerfed the absolute shit out of them in the second test patch. Everyone thought they were going to nerf the WTE100 but they left it alone. I personally didn’t think the WTE100 needed nerfing, but that seemed to be the whine from a lot of players. I do think the Pz4 WT (tier 9) was over nerfed (tier 8 is still ok), but wargaming won’t admit that until several months worth of gaming statistics are in.

If the STB1 is left like this and turns out to be overpowered on the live server it won’t be changed until months later.

By: Myabo

Myabo — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:12:22 +0000

the amount of gold shells in tier 8-10 battles has not decreased/increased since the last time it was reported (some times after gold ammo for credits was introduced)

how can they sell us this bullshit, is beyond me…
since I installed that mode that tells you what kind of ammo type is shot at you, I am just disgusted with the amount of gold flying right and left specially from “good” and “great” players who are supposed to know how and where to aim and are supposed to be “good” and “great”…

I already knew that bad players are spamming gold shells just to be able to barely stay in the game.. but a lot of green, blue and purple players are shooting only gold shells specially in tanks that don’t need it at all, like tier 10 mediums or even tier 10 TDs which I find just retarded and sad :(