<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Historical Accuracy: KV-220</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thx for the response :) I checked few russian mid tiers but didn&#039;t find the gun. I was just curious what were the stats of it. Yea with that gun it would be UP, so Zis-5 seems like a reasonable solution eventough it&#039;s not historical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the response :) I checked few russian mid tiers but didn&#8217;t find the gun. I was just curious what were the stats of it. Yea with that gun it would be UP, so Zis-5 seems like a reasonable solution eventough it&#8217;s not historical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adinouvo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adinouvo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least the gun is better than the F-32. The F-32 in game only has 69 mm of penetration. You can be happy to have that ZiS-5 in stead of that F-32.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the gun is better than the F-32. The F-32 in game only has 69 mm of penetration. You can be happy to have that ZiS-5 in stead of that F-32.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KV-220 &#8211; is it worth it? &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KV-220 &#8211; is it worth it? &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] history (yes, this vehicle actually existed and fought), have a look at Ensign Expendable&#8217;s KV-220 article. It&#8217;s worth [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] history (yes, this vehicle actually existed and fought), have a look at Ensign Expendable&#8217;s KV-220 article. It&#8217;s worth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnsignExpendable</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnsignExpendable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can get a BT-SV by buying a gift pack from a CIS retailer, they pop up online with worldwide delivery every so often.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get a BT-SV by buying a gift pack from a CIS retailer, they pop up online with worldwide delivery every so often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GravityTrash</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GravityTrash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As i see on those pic im going to like this tank! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As i see on those pic im going to like this tank! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haren</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My ARL 44 gamestyle is 105mm close combat. The long 90mm is an overkill as far as pen is considered, and is has much less DPM with same-shit aim time. Sloped UFP on ARL can ding suprising shots if angled properly, and it is really enjoyable to play that way. I&#039;m still playing it even thou it&#039;s elited, as I want to get the Sixth Sense before jumping up the tier ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ARL 44 gamestyle is 105mm close combat. The long 90mm is an overkill as far as pen is considered, and is has much less DPM with same-shit aim time. Sloped UFP on ARL can ding suprising shots if angled properly, and it is really enjoyable to play that way. I&#8217;m still playing it even thou it&#8217;s elited, as I want to get the Sixth Sense before jumping up the tier ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SgtShidner59</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SgtShidner59]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the ONLY reason i may get this tank...is so that i can add it to my collection of tanks that will never see the light of day again. Other than that its not a very effective combat vehicle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the ONLY reason i may get this tank&#8230;is so that i can add it to my collection of tanks that will never see the light of day again. Other than that its not a very effective combat vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kastman</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kastman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol and price is set at 49,99 euro(with 10500 gold and 30day prem).. no chance in hell I would buy that at that price..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol and price is set at 49,99 euro(with 10500 gold and 30day prem).. no chance in hell I would buy that at that price..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonder if the Germans Hummiliated the KV-220. 

I will try looking into my German SPG books and see if the time and place match up .Unlikely ofc that a German SPG hit it as there was never enough SPGs to go around and regular Field Artillery and Ju 87 support was more available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if the Germans Hummiliated the KV-220. </p>
<p>I will try looking into my German SPG books and see if the time and place match up .Unlikely ofc that a German SPG hit it as there was never enough SPGs to go around and regular Field Artillery and Ju 87 support was more available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelTheGhost</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/11/28/historical-accuracy-kv-220/#comment-89486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelTheGhost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5722#comment-89486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This tank is a beast .
Is the best tier 5 prem for me.
Kinda sluggish but not slow. Gun that can take on most of tier 5 tank.
It can take a hell of a beating , and make good money too.
http://i.imgur.com/XfEchVu.jpg

My stats for this tank. (Solo Pub only)
http://i.imgur.com/T7Rn934.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/rDDPhtn.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tank is a beast .<br />
Is the best tier 5 prem for me.<br />
Kinda sluggish but not slow. Gun that can take on most of tier 5 tank.<br />
It can take a hell of a beating , and make good money too.<br />
<a href="http://i.imgur.com/XfEchVu.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/XfEchVu.jpg</a></p>
<p>My stats for this tank. (Solo Pub only)<br />
<a href="http://i.imgur.com/T7Rn934.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/T7Rn934.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://i.imgur.com/rDDPhtn.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/rDDPhtn.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
