<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storm asks about &#8220;inconvenient&#8221; tanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolaevna</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikolaevna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 04:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised hardly anyone mentioned the French D1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised hardly anyone mentioned the French D1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han Sulu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Han Sulu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I meant the Churchill 7, not 3... my bad. Of course premium tanks are meant to be worse than their non premium coutnerpart.
The type t-34 is on that list because it is similar to the russian one, but worse (gun depression).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant the Churchill 7, not 3&#8230; my bad. Of course premium tanks are meant to be worse than their non premium coutnerpart.<br />
The type t-34 is on that list because it is similar to the russian one, but worse (gun depression).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politx_killer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Politx_killer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet the Ac mle. 48 gets an even better gun, better mobility and around the same level of effective armour. It&#039;s just been outdated by the power creep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet the Ac mle. 48 gets an even better gun, better mobility and around the same level of effective armour. It&#8217;s just been outdated by the power creep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demonsmaycry</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[demonsmaycry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sturer emil stock a nightmare ? lol and ferdinand stock?:D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sturer emil stock a nightmare ? lol and ferdinand stock?:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*edit &quot;Wasnt that bad&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*edit &#8220;Wasnt that bad&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually JpzIV wasnt that good.
It felt like slightly nerfed stug imho.
The key to success is to use L70, not short 88.
It sucks hard with &quot;top&quot; gun. But its kinda okay with L70. And yes, L70 is still pretty good gun at tier 6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually JpzIV wasnt that good.<br />
It felt like slightly nerfed stug imho.<br />
The key to success is to use L70, not short 88.<br />
It sucks hard with &#8220;top&#8221; gun. But its kinda okay with L70. And yes, L70 is still pretty good gun at tier 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kauris Azurai</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kauris Azurai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the tanks people complain about are not an issue lol.

I can hardly think of a tank I hated, I usually learned to play them all properly. I even started doing well in and enjoying the v39! I got 7 kills in that glorious render range sniper.

And the m3 lee, waaaaay back when I was a horrid noob I got three kills in it. You don&#039;t get it. I. was. horrid. tomato. trash. I got three kills in m3 lee. It has the rof of the e-25 at tier 4 with 100 damage. The only true downside is the accuracy and the tallness of the tank in my opinion. 
Just don&#039;t crest hills with it and you&#039;re fine.

Amx 40? I sucked in it. But the armour is amazing. people need to stop being negative and look at the positives. I don&#039;t see POS I see POSitives.

And I&#039;m going down the a44 a43 line soon. I&#039;ve heard you need to play the a44 like a td for the armour to be more effective.

I can&#039;t wait for the frying pan. I pwned in it on test. Things couldn&#039;t hit me. The tank can use its ridiculously low profile to &quot;Hide&quot; in plain sight via small hills.
Basically it&#039;s a large ELC with a bigger rotation arc. 

And as a final note, I hope they don&#039;t remove any of these tanks. The m7 is on that list.
It is my favorite tank. And I&#039;ve seen plenty of camo&#039;d m7 drivers, so I know I&#039;m not the only one who loves it.(or likes it)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the tanks people complain about are not an issue lol.</p>
<p>I can hardly think of a tank I hated, I usually learned to play them all properly. I even started doing well in and enjoying the v39! I got 7 kills in that glorious render range sniper.</p>
<p>And the m3 lee, waaaaay back when I was a horrid noob I got three kills in it. You don&#8217;t get it. I. was. horrid. tomato. trash. I got three kills in m3 lee. It has the rof of the e-25 at tier 4 with 100 damage. The only true downside is the accuracy and the tallness of the tank in my opinion.<br />
Just don&#8217;t crest hills with it and you&#8217;re fine.</p>
<p>Amx 40? I sucked in it. But the armour is amazing. people need to stop being negative and look at the positives. I don&#8217;t see POS I see POSitives.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m going down the a44 a43 line soon. I&#8217;ve heard you need to play the a44 like a td for the armour to be more effective.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the frying pan. I pwned in it on test. Things couldn&#8217;t hit me. The tank can use its ridiculously low profile to &#8220;Hide&#8221; in plain sight via small hills.<br />
Basically it&#8217;s a large ELC with a bigger rotation arc. </p>
<p>And as a final note, I hope they don&#8217;t remove any of these tanks. The m7 is on that list.<br />
It is my favorite tank. And I&#8217;ve seen plenty of camo&#8217;d m7 drivers, so I know I&#8217;m not the only one who loves it.(or likes it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daaz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me, the only tanks i really hated were AMX 38, and AT 8 with the first gun.
(AMX 40 was also bad, but i still managed to enjoy it.)
For tanks i really enjoy are PZ IC, Renault UE57,Churchill III (if that even counts being premium).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the only tanks i really hated were AMX 38, and AT 8 with the first gun.<br />
(AMX 40 was also bad, but i still managed to enjoy it.)<br />
For tanks i really enjoy are PZ IC, Renault UE57,Churchill III (if that even counts being premium).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr3awsome</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr3awsome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of the ones I have played I would have to say the Churchill Mk VII or the A20
The only tanks I&#039;ve ever given up on]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of the ones I have played I would have to say the Churchill Mk VII or the A20<br />
The only tanks I&#8217;ve ever given up on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/04/storm-asks-about-inconvenient-tanks/#comment-91375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yurra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=5940#comment-91375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A-20 made me give up on the soviet meds. Might give it a try, though, I&#039;m not very far from T-34.
I also found Pz 3 A terrible, don&#039;t remember why as it was 2 years ago.
Covenanter was not bad nor good, but the constant engine fires really bugged me.
AufklarungsPanther is awkward, to say the least, but I manage to make it work.
Leopard was also uncomfortable, too bad I sold it right before it recieved the 30mm gun.
GW Tiger...I believe that the 21cm gun hits more than the 17cm one, even though the latter is supposed to be more accurate (WG buff arty a bit pls :P)
Tiger H wasn&#039;t really good back then, I didn&#039;t like it very much.
Lorr 39 AM is plain terrible, even before the arty nerf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-20 made me give up on the soviet meds. Might give it a try, though, I&#8217;m not very far from T-34.<br />
I also found Pz 3 A terrible, don&#8217;t remember why as it was 2 years ago.<br />
Covenanter was not bad nor good, but the constant engine fires really bugged me.<br />
AufklarungsPanther is awkward, to say the least, but I manage to make it work.<br />
Leopard was also uncomfortable, too bad I sold it right before it recieved the 30mm gun.<br />
GW Tiger&#8230;I believe that the 21cm gun hits more than the 17cm one, even though the latter is supposed to be more accurate (WG buff arty a bit pls :P)<br />
Tiger H wasn&#8217;t really good back then, I didn&#8217;t like it very much.<br />
Lorr 39 AM is plain terrible, even before the arty nerf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
