Comments on: Object 430 versus Object 140 and T-62A

By: still_guns

still_guns — Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:05:15 +0000

So it’s engine is a sexually transmitted disease huh? Steer WELL clear XD

By: mortenelkjaer

mortenelkjaer — Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:23:42 +0000

Now I know what to spend all the credits on – 2x Daily will apply on “the same tank”. Sadly it will be divided on three crews.

By: Theodosius

Theodosius — Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:00:35 +0000

IMO the tank just needs more hitpoints.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:44:41 +0000

Oh sure WG, delay adding unique lines such as the second French Heavy line (or a true Medium line for that matter), and claim that certain tanks won’t be added because they’re “too similar to other tanks”, but continue to add still more clones of the T-54/Type 59, T-62A and IS series to the game.

What a load of bullshit.

By: Platypusbill_WoT

Platypusbill_WoT — Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:49:04 +0000

Not implying the Jagdmaus is necessary in any way, just pointing out the inconsistency of the argument.

By: ComradeHX

ComradeHX — Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:47:36 +0000

effective armour = after normalization.

By: Ultrasonic2

Ultrasonic2 — Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:47:29 +0000

i guess the real question is which would you take into battle a 430 or stb-1

By: ComradeHX

ComradeHX — Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:46:16 +0000

It’s Japanese, not Soviet.

It will probably get the Fatton treatment soon.

Even then, it’s still way better than Fatton, lol.

By: Ultrasonic2

Ultrasonic2 — Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:46:00 +0000

dont you feel the 430 is just a t54 with more pen and rof . Seems better to just play the 54 and get all those t9 matchs which heaps of 8′s

By: Ultrasonic2

Ultrasonic2 — Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:43:42 +0000

on thing to note is both the 62 and 140 have 5D less on the lower plate where as the 430 is the same so thats a good thing . still i wish the UG was at 65 then it would have been an awesome tank