<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10.12.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10.12.2013 &#124; WoTRomania</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10.12.2013 &#124; WoTRomania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sursa [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sursa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kauris Azurai</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kauris Azurai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite map..... This is one of the only decisions WG has made that I really disagree with... I loved that map to pieces...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite map&#8230;.. This is one of the only decisions WG has made that I really disagree with&#8230; I loved that map to pieces&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xelos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xelos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Leopard 1 will not get the “late” (1970′s) turret (SS: welded, boxy)

A Leopard 1 turret with special protection versus HEAT would be interesting touch for Leopard.

- Veider (when confronted with the Maus II turret) states that if they add new turret and more DPM to Maus, there will immediately be too many Maus tanks around

The turret buff alone would be enough. While the ROF is a bit slow, I think when more crew skills are added the Maus may have a distinctive edge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Leopard 1 will not get the “late” (1970′s) turret (SS: welded, boxy)</p>
<p>A Leopard 1 turret with special protection versus HEAT would be interesting touch for Leopard.</p>
<p>- Veider (when confronted with the Maus II turret) states that if they add new turret and more DPM to Maus, there will immediately be too many Maus tanks around</p>
<p>The turret buff alone would be enough. While the ROF is a bit slow, I think when more crew skills are added the Maus may have a distinctive edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valrag .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valrag .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thx for the info, didnt kew that :)

But given the fact the Jagdtiger ingame also has a higher ROF , as does the Ferdinand, i still dont see a reason why the maus shouldnt :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx for the info, didnt kew that :)</p>
<p>But given the fact the Jagdtiger ingame also has a higher ROF , as does the Ferdinand, i still dont see a reason why the maus shouldnt :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baske_74</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baske_74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sturer Emill doesn have premium ammo, only AP and HE.
but have to agree that something needs to be done about premium ammo, it almost completey negates the use of heavily armoured vehicles. last week i was penned through my E-100 angled turret front and even gunmantlet every time by enemies.

those vehicles sacrifices a lot of mobility, turret traverse, RoF for more armor and a bigger hitpool. and with the recent addition of missions anyone can get cash easily and stock up with Premium rounds. i only carry a few on my Loewe which gets thrown into tier X matches all the time now a days. but rarely use it and will opt for re-positioning rather then using goldrounds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sturer Emill doesn have premium ammo, only AP and HE.<br />
but have to agree that something needs to be done about premium ammo, it almost completey negates the use of heavily armoured vehicles. last week i was penned through my E-100 angled turret front and even gunmantlet every time by enemies.</p>
<p>those vehicles sacrifices a lot of mobility, turret traverse, RoF for more armor and a bigger hitpool. and with the recent addition of missions anyone can get cash easily and stock up with Premium rounds. i only carry a few on my Loewe which gets thrown into tier X matches all the time now a days. but rarely use it and will opt for re-positioning rather then using goldrounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[worst maps ever]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>worst maps ever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I agree with this. I&#039;m not a superb player or anything, but I try to give constructive comment, so the players left alive make better decisions and get a better chance on winning the game (for me, while I&#039;m dead) aswell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree with this. I&#8217;m not a superb player or anything, but I try to give constructive comment, so the players left alive make better decisions and get a better chance on winning the game (for me, while I&#8217;m dead) aswell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatecrash</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gatecrash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This. This should be the thought of the vast majority of people with half-working brains. Limit the load of prem shells and everything will be alright. Then, everyone can only be able to use gold for what it&#039;s intented for: The occasional shot of high importance when your normal shells would bounce.
I honestly can&#039;t believe why WG can&#039;t just implement such a little easy restriction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This. This should be the thought of the vast majority of people with half-working brains. Limit the load of prem shells and everything will be alright. Then, everyone can only be able to use gold for what it&#8217;s intented for: The occasional shot of high importance when your normal shells would bounce.<br />
I honestly can&#8217;t believe why WG can&#8217;t just implement such a little easy restriction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillboy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lel, everyone knows that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lel, everyone knows that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macmac</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/10/10-12-2013/#comment-94142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macmac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 07:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6266#comment-94142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Storm states that on the new Japanese map, most people go into the city guuuyyyyyyss i smel  BULLLSSHIIIITT  all  going FAKING  HIIIIIILLLSSS there is 1 WAY on this map u can go and not being kiled by td in 1 sec after spot,
-battles pre-determined by the fact one team gets more “noobs” than others during MM? “Remove your XVM and everything will be alright. It’s all in your head.” guys u funy.... why u just separatee players who have less than 700 efi and give them another server ? mm wod be bad? they dont care]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storm states that on the new Japanese map, most people go into the city guuuyyyyyyss i smel  BULLLSSHIIIITT  all  going FAKING  HIIIIIILLLSSS there is 1 WAY on this map u can go and not being kiled by td in 1 sec after spot,<br />
-battles pre-determined by the fact one team gets more “noobs” than others during MM? “Remove your XVM and everything will be alright. It’s all in your head.” guys u funy&#8230;. why u just separatee players who have less than 700 efi and give them another server ? mm wod be bad? they dont care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
