Comments on: Model changes in 0.8.10 test 2

By: OttoVon Bismarck

OttoVon Bismarck — Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:21:11 +0000

Glad to see WG are using their time with changing the gun lengths with a few cm instead of fixing the game

Jahrain — Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:34:22 +0000

Nice to have historically sized TDs….or at least the german ones :-)

Looking at O268…….

“Some are more equal than others”

Comes from one who never purchased Ferdinand, and went JPII way instead.

Medjed — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:26:02 +0000

Now i can hit Ferdi controlling mouse with my foot and with my eyes blindfolded. But, it’s HISTORICALLY ACCURATE AT LAST!!!

Foxton — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:16:15 +0000

No fix for the unhistorical IS4 frontal slope?

Zarax — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:08:58 +0000

JT would be a tier 8.5 without the long 128, hull down it’s very strong and mobility would have to be chopped to make it balanced…

Westonbirt_EU — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:22:07 +0000

A shitload > A whole bunch > A lot, > Quite a bit > Somewhat > A bit > Slightly > Marginally

Westonbirt_EU — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:20:34 +0000

It’s a small price for having tanks with the SAME HULL have the SAME SIZE.

KrVa46 — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:16:55 +0000

The changes on the IS6, is it just cosmetic? Because apart from some very tiny track and turret changes I don’t see any changes on the armour model.

I really hope so anyway. I love my IS6. I’m at 56, 5 % WR and I never play it in passion because of the preferred mm.

Jorge Tuero — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:04:01 +0000

Thank you for the GIFs, they’re amazing

havoc313 — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:58:13 +0000

actually i think there is a small hit to its camo