Comments on: T-44-85 changes in 8.10

By: lightball20

lightball20 — Sat, 14 Dec 2013 19:46:02 +0000

Just because the T-44-85 is better than the T-43 doesn’t mean that its pay-to-win. Its pay to win if its better than every single Tier 7 medium tank. And at the very least I do believe its still worse than Comet.

By: ComradeHX

ComradeHX — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:33:23 +0000

Actually the 100mm was terrible.

Accuracy is subpar(as see on T-34-1), slow to aim, bloom is huge…etc. And very low dpm.

By: meangeanssn756

meangeanssn756 — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:34:00 +0000

T44 on par with T43
Better frontal turret armor 115>90
Better terrain resistance
Better hull traverse by far. 54<38
Same aim time 2.3
Better pen
Same hit points

Worse hpt 16.77<20.8
Worse depression -6 -8
Worse dispersion .24<.22
Worse turret traverse 40<46
Worse accuracy .47<.37

To say that the T4485 is better is tough as these tanks will play a little different. T4485 will be able to hull down a little better. Still not a brawler. If it can carry vert and have limited mm it will be very good though.

By: Medjed

Medjed — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:30:01 +0000

better radio – This already is proof T-43 is better

By: Homer_J

Homer_J — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:39:40 +0000

In that case you won’t mind the T-43 getting the 100mm back. :)

By: Doctor

Doctor — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:20:27 +0000

This tank be a super star. Hopefully the next T59, I am so going to get one.

By: ApplesauceBandit

ApplesauceBandit — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:50:24 +0000

With the massive increase in firepower, I wouldn’t call this a nerf.

By: ApplesauceBandit

ApplesauceBandit — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:42 +0000

By: ApplesauceBandit

ApplesauceBandit — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:26 +0000

The same one as it used to, just with new shells.

By: ApplesauceBandit

ApplesauceBandit — Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:48:36 +0000

Nope, it gets 6 degrees