Comments on: Soviet PzIIIs and Derivatives http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Silentstalker http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95740 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 08:55:16 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95740 no

]]> By: Captian Nemo http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95724 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:20:56 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95724 I don’t blame the infantry at all… That T-70 crew was lucky that a beating was all they got from the infantry.

]]> By: akspecs http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95707 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 03:06:26 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95707 you beat me to it LOL

knowing how small that little t-70 is, imagine that poor crew “sorry comrade! *gets smacked left and right*”

]]> By: Nvincible http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95705 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 02:48:34 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95705 “The number of red stars was often not enough. M. Svirin’s book on this vehicle describes an episode where a T-70 tank opened fire on a StuG III from the two batteries that were supporting the 3rd Guards Tank Army. No one died, but the T-70 crew was beaten by the infantry riding on top of the StuG.”

” the T-70 crew was beaten by the infantry riding on top of the StuG”

LOL.

]]> By: havoc313 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95696 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:30:27 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95696 SS can you confirm what they plan on doing with the Fv4202?

]]> By: Bravo_two_Six http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95694 Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:11:07 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95694 As regular premiums such as the Pz 38H 735 (f) Pz B2 740 (f) e.t.c. otherwise they would have to change how the existing premiums work.

]]> By: Silentstalker http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95675 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:56:52 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95675 SAU (or SU) means “samokhodnaya ustanovka” – self propelled gun, no matter what gun it is (can be both an AT-gun such as the SU-100 or a howtzer like the SU-122). SG means “samokhodnaya gaubnica” – specifically self-propelled howitzer. That (A) in the end means “artshturm” – Soviet equivalent of “Sturmgeschutz”

]]> By: Dominatus http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95672 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:51:11 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95672 SG-122 sounds like it would be fun to play, a (relatively) rapid fire derp vehicle. Any info on the naming convention though?

]]> By: thewolfpack http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95661 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:59:56 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95661 Sry meant the cap. KV-1 with 75 mm KwK 40 L43

]]> By: thewolfpack http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/14/soviet-pziiis-and-derivatives/#comment-95660 Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:58:39 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6435#comment-95660 Great article, GJ.

Does anyone know who these captured tanks will work? (KV-1 /w 7.5mm, T-4, T-5)

Will they earn more silver / xp like the other gold tanks or will they have other / no benefits?

]]>