<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 18.12.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun grind isn&#039;t bad once you have the first 120 (I free xp&#039;d it) but holy god damn are the stats bullshit. Average damage is definitely closer to like 350 than 390]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun grind isn&#8217;t bad once you have the first 120 (I free xp&#8217;d it) but holy god damn are the stats bullshit. Average damage is definitely closer to like 350 than 390</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabbatino</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sabbatino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- the M103/T110E5 120mm gun grind is just fine&quot;

Who asks these retarded questions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- the M103/T110E5 120mm gun grind is just fine&#8221;</p>
<p>Who asks these retarded questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlaK</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FlaK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 02:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[su-85 top gun gives more damage than stug3 top gun]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>su-85 top gun gives more damage than stug3 top gun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluedragon777</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluedragon777]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t like SU-85,Coffin and SCA?How terrible.Go play AT-2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t like SU-85,Coffin and SCA?How terrible.Go play AT-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComradeHX</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComradeHX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does that mean non-penning HE module damage (which I checked to mostly be same as AP module damage on paper) is going to first be reduced by armour and THEN get reduced by distance it had to travel inside tank to module?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean non-penning HE module damage (which I checked to mostly be same as AP module damage on paper) is going to first be reduced by armour and THEN get reduced by distance it had to travel inside tank to module?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComradeHX</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComradeHX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camo is good on SU-85; but SU-100 is the one with really good camo.

SU-85 is still having its nerfed viewrange from before(when it had 107mm).

How terrible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camo is good on SU-85; but SU-100 is the one with really good camo.</p>
<p>SU-85 is still having its nerfed viewrange from before(when it had 107mm).</p>
<p>How terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer_J</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homer_J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who needs the top gun, just use the 122. I did and researched the top gun to save having to grind it on SU-100

122mm stronk sniping gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs the top gun, just use the 122. I did and researched the top gun to save having to grind it on SU-100</p>
<p>122mm stronk sniping gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazomir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazomir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Su-85 has 280 view range, wich is kind of terrible. I mean thats crap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Su-85 has 280 view range, wich is kind of terrible. I mean thats crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Communist</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anti-Communist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How terrible. Tell me more how Doom Toaster has better gun Than su-85. Now tell me how, Su-85 is not open topped, has some armor, has far better camo, far better firing angle than Toaster with last gun. Pls. Tell me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How terrible. Tell me more how Doom Toaster has better gun Than su-85. Now tell me how, Su-85 is not open topped, has some armor, has far better camo, far better firing angle than Toaster with last gun. Pls. Tell me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggram</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/18-12-2013/#comment-97152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ggram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6544#comment-97152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure almost all stock grinds are terrible. Now back on the topic, there is no justification to set SU-85&#039;s top gun at 15,5k XP other than someone accidentally added an extra 1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure almost all stock grinds are terrible. Now back on the topic, there is no justification to set SU-85&#8242;s top gun at 15,5k XP other than someone accidentally added an extra 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
