<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vehicle camouflage overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mortenelkjaer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-99568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mortenelkjaer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-99568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you create an exportable version of this? (I already saved the paged locally, but I&#039;d like an excel, word or pdf or something please)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you create an exportable version of this? (I already saved the paged locally, but I&#8217;d like an excel, word or pdf or something please)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richmi</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-98367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-98367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I must have missed that, thx for info.
Btw, ExoNut, are you such asshole in real life too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I must have missed that, thx for info.<br />
Btw, ExoNut, are you such asshole in real life too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago Marquez</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thiago Marquez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow i looked at wrong stats and thought T95 was 24%]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow i looked at wrong stats and thought T95 was 24%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmoredColossus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArmoredColossus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is before factoring in the Russian Cloaking Device that is 100% &quot;Historically Accurate.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is before factoring in the Russian Cloaking Device that is 100% &#8220;Historically Accurate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmoredColossus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArmoredColossus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the German arty ones make no sense...so a GW Tiger and GW Tiger P are only slightly easier to spot than a Tiny Bison by size comparison, yet a Hummel much bigger than a Bison is harder to detect????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the German arty ones make no sense&#8230;so a GW Tiger and GW Tiger P are only slightly easier to spot than a Tiny Bison by size comparison, yet a Hummel much bigger than a Bison is harder to detect????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jupiter</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jupiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 02:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is that Russian bias calculated by this Formula:
float Bias = value;
if ( this.Tank != Russian)
{
  RusianBias = (1 - value);
}
RusianBias = (1+ value);
return RusianBias;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that Russian bias calculated by this Formula:<br />
float Bias = value;<br />
if ( this.Tank != Russian)<br />
{<br />
  RusianBias = (1 &#8211; value);<br />
}<br />
RusianBias = (1+ value);<br />
return RusianBias;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gryphon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gryphon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camonets are additive, and the percentages are +5% heavy/SPG. +10% Mediums, + 15% TDs.

Camo paint is the same, but +2, +3, +4 respectively

So a Waffle E-100 which has 0.4% base camo factor, with a net now has 15.4%, add paint its 19.4%. 

Yes, they need to rethink that one...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camonets are additive, and the percentages are +5% heavy/SPG. +10% Mediums, + 15% TDs.</p>
<p>Camo paint is the same, but +2, +3, +4 respectively</p>
<p>So a Waffle E-100 which has 0.4% base camo factor, with a net now has 15.4%, add paint its 19.4%. </p>
<p>Yes, they need to rethink that one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jupiter</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jupiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh.. even Chinese copypaste tank has better armor than Leo 1. Next time, don&#039;t believe what they say about German tanks. And Obj 430...HTF it has better camo than Bat chat? new T62A clone will become the best camo Medium? serious?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh.. even Chinese copypaste tank has better armor than Leo 1. Next time, don&#8217;t believe what they say about German tanks. And Obj 430&#8230;HTF it has better camo than Bat chat? new T62A clone will become the best camo Medium? serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jupiter</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jupiter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leo1 sure has the best camo in tier 10...because Russian is not count here. All Russian tanks have invisible device...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo1 sure has the best camo in tier 10&#8230;because Russian is not count here. All Russian tanks have invisible device&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMminion</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/18/vehicle-camouflage-overview/#comment-97219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DMminion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6536#comment-97219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like how the STB-1 is ever so slightly smaller than the Leo1, but Leo1 have better camo..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how the STB-1 is ever so slightly smaller than the Leo1, but Leo1 have better camo..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
