Every law student has to learn EU law, at least in my country. Our school also provides means to learn about other nations law system, namely UK, German, Austrian and to some extent about Italian, French, Spanish and I am not so sure but I think also Russian is offered. The latter are offered but there is not too high interest in it so they does not provide the depth you can achieve in Austrain law for example, which I think next to UK law offers the most related subjects to it. You simply had to attend some of them to pass, without them you would not have enough credits. I choose UK, sice it was the easiest for me since I undrestood that language (it is teached in their native language). Also, in the first year you got quite a lot of supplementary subjects about history and current state of systems and some were offered even in second year, although they were mostly for low amount of credits. For example I had one subject called “World law systems” where they teached us some basic even about Egypt and China for example and others. I admit I am not too deep into customers protection yet but I already passed EU law and am deep into International law, so it would be quite rude to say what I say is “wild guesses”. I have no idea where you come from and how law schools work in there, for example schools in UK and USA they are quite different from ours, so this all may be new to people from USA or other countries, but I am surprised that someone did not know at least that in Europe you had to learn about EU law and about other members national law. You really think lawyers learn only about national law?

What kind of lawyer are you becoming anyways that you’re so familiar with the legal systems of three different countries, both in and outside the EU?

You’re making wild guesses here.

no one took Blizzard to court over account fees. Especially since you paid for 30 days of gaming, and you received those 30 days of gaming.

Or: Edoc, stop posting in legal threads. You’re worse than completely clueless.