<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WG Stream QA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R4Ging</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4Ging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[both tanks are balanced nicely, but imo the IS-6 needs a buff to be considered as good as KV-5 (which is quite good for a tier 8 premium anyway while IS-6 is just fine for a tier 8 premium).

KV-5&#039;s pros over IS-6:
230 more health points
5km/h more top speed (better downhill speed)
0.06/0.1/0.56 better terrain resistance
nearly double total weight (much stronger ramming)
much thicker armor all around (can bounce even the BL-10 without angling?)
2mm more gold ammo pen
250 more damage points per minute (gets even higher with reload time reducing equipment, etc)
0.02m less min aim circle (accuracy)
0.54sec faster aim time
good gun stabilization (can fire on the move with precision)
double ammo capacity
very cheap standard ammo
2 more crew members (faster crew training)

IS-6&#039;s pros over KV-5:
1.61 more power/weight (better uphill speed)
3km/h more reverse speed
2.75 d/s more turret traverse speed
better camo
8mm more standard ammo pen
90 more damage points per shot
stronger HE

so -
KV-5&#039;s better terrain resistance lets it move nearly as fast as IS-6, and possibly faster when on soft terrain.
IS-6&#039;s lack of weak-spot gives it an edge, but only against low pen guns (200+ pen guns can easily go through unless hit at an angle).
IS-6&#039;s all-out worse gun handling + less damage/minute makes it very hard to do damage even with the damage per shot.
KV-5&#039;s box shape lets it angle to increase armor effectiveness while angling with IS-6 doesn&#039;t help much.
KV-5&#039;s very good rear armor allows it to hide its biggest weakspot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both tanks are balanced nicely, but imo the IS-6 needs a buff to be considered as good as KV-5 (which is quite good for a tier 8 premium anyway while IS-6 is just fine for a tier 8 premium).</p>
<p>KV-5&#8242;s pros over IS-6:<br />
230 more health points<br />
5km/h more top speed (better downhill speed)<br />
0.06/0.1/0.56 better terrain resistance<br />
nearly double total weight (much stronger ramming)<br />
much thicker armor all around (can bounce even the BL-10 without angling?)<br />
2mm more gold ammo pen<br />
250 more damage points per minute (gets even higher with reload time reducing equipment, etc)<br />
0.02m less min aim circle (accuracy)<br />
0.54sec faster aim time<br />
good gun stabilization (can fire on the move with precision)<br />
double ammo capacity<br />
very cheap standard ammo<br />
2 more crew members (faster crew training)</p>
<p>IS-6&#8242;s pros over KV-5:<br />
1.61 more power/weight (better uphill speed)<br />
3km/h more reverse speed<br />
2.75 d/s more turret traverse speed<br />
better camo<br />
8mm more standard ammo pen<br />
90 more damage points per shot<br />
stronger HE</p>
<p>so -<br />
KV-5&#8242;s better terrain resistance lets it move nearly as fast as IS-6, and possibly faster when on soft terrain.<br />
IS-6&#8242;s lack of weak-spot gives it an edge, but only against low pen guns (200+ pen guns can easily go through unless hit at an angle).<br />
IS-6&#8242;s all-out worse gun handling + less damage/minute makes it very hard to do damage even with the damage per shot.<br />
KV-5&#8242;s box shape lets it angle to increase armor effectiveness while angling with IS-6 doesn&#8217;t help much.<br />
KV-5&#8242;s very good rear armor allows it to hide its biggest weakspot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrMann02</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrMann02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is my pic from when I played BF3? I only just registered here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is my pic from when I played BF3? I only just registered here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrMann02</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrMann02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- there will be a new game mode for clans in 2014
- there will be a possibility to choose map in “clan battles” (??? probably meant Team battles) soon

Are they talking about the new game mode for clans? possibly to be called clan battles?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- there will be a new game mode for clans in 2014<br />
- there will be a possibility to choose map in “clan battles” (??? probably meant Team battles) soon</p>
<p>Are they talking about the new game mode for clans? possibly to be called clan battles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have a source for this that you could share? I&#039;m having trouble believing that ~86 tons driven by the equivalent of a large pickup truck engine could reach 20kph unassisted. Just by themselves, the transmission ratios needed to get and keep it moving would be quite limiting to its top speed...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a source for this that you could share? I&#8217;m having trouble believing that ~86 tons driven by the equivalent of a large pickup truck engine could reach 20kph unassisted. Just by themselves, the transmission ratios needed to get and keep it moving would be quite limiting to its top speed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T30 has comparatively shoddy hull armor and a slower reload, worse aim time, less accuracy.
The Tortoise&#039;s armor is easily defeated by anyone who knows where to shoot it (hint: the massive SHOOTME cupola on top is a good place to start, and the entire right side of the casemate is weaker), and is thinner all around to being with. It is comparatively faster though, I&#039;ll give you that. Accelerates quite well for its size if I recall right. Key difference for mobility between it and the T95 is that it doesn&#039;t have a garbage engine and is slightly lighter (smaller gun, thinner armor).
The JPzE100 is tier 10 :v (and has a big ol&#039; lower plate)
The F155 is also tier 10, and is overpowered (combination of ridiculous armor, tiny bouncy weak spots, good maneuverability, medium-tank acceleration and high speed, massive high-penetration burst damage). Not exactly something to compare to when trying to determine what&#039;s balanced.

The E100&#039;s upper plate is thicker only because of its slope, the E3&#039;s is as thick only in a very small strip on the &quot;beak&quot;, but granted it is as thick. Both have big ol&#039; easy-to-shoot lower plates though, while the T95 doesn&#039;t, so...?

If you bring HEAT into the scene, the E3 can also be penned straight through its mantle, and the E100 through its turret face, so who really cares about their upper plates when there&#039;re far more accessible parts to shoot? The T95 gets into tier 9 games where&#039;s it&#039;s less likely to deal with scrubs throwing loads of pure HEAT around; its armor is stronger by virtue of dealing with less powerful guns half the time.

Above all, every other tank destroyer you brought up can be penned fairly easily by the T95 (provided it doesn&#039;t shoot their rather obvious strongest armor sections), while - as long as they miss its cupolas and aren&#039;t below to shoot its tiny lower plate - it can pretty much ignore them and most other things firing AP and tier X medium APCR. The FV215b 183 is about the only thing that really threatens it with credit ammo, and even then it has to hit the small area around the mantle with its derpy 0.4 accuracy.

THAT is why it&#039;s so slow and unmaneuverable. A fast T95 would be overpowered, especially at tier 9.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T30 has comparatively shoddy hull armor and a slower reload, worse aim time, less accuracy.<br />
The Tortoise&#8217;s armor is easily defeated by anyone who knows where to shoot it (hint: the massive SHOOTME cupola on top is a good place to start, and the entire right side of the casemate is weaker), and is thinner all around to being with. It is comparatively faster though, I&#8217;ll give you that. Accelerates quite well for its size if I recall right. Key difference for mobility between it and the T95 is that it doesn&#8217;t have a garbage engine and is slightly lighter (smaller gun, thinner armor).<br />
The JPzE100 is tier 10 :v (and has a big ol&#8217; lower plate)<br />
The F155 is also tier 10, and is overpowered (combination of ridiculous armor, tiny bouncy weak spots, good maneuverability, medium-tank acceleration and high speed, massive high-penetration burst damage). Not exactly something to compare to when trying to determine what&#8217;s balanced.</p>
<p>The E100&#8242;s upper plate is thicker only because of its slope, the E3&#8242;s is as thick only in a very small strip on the &#8220;beak&#8221;, but granted it is as thick. Both have big ol&#8217; easy-to-shoot lower plates though, while the T95 doesn&#8217;t, so&#8230;?</p>
<p>If you bring HEAT into the scene, the E3 can also be penned straight through its mantle, and the E100 through its turret face, so who really cares about their upper plates when there&#8217;re far more accessible parts to shoot? The T95 gets into tier 9 games where&#8217;s it&#8217;s less likely to deal with scrubs throwing loads of pure HEAT around; its armor is stronger by virtue of dealing with less powerful guns half the time.</p>
<p>Above all, every other tank destroyer you brought up can be penned fairly easily by the T95 (provided it doesn&#8217;t shoot their rather obvious strongest armor sections), while &#8211; as long as they miss its cupolas and aren&#8217;t below to shoot its tiny lower plate &#8211; it can pretty much ignore them and most other things firing AP and tier X medium APCR. The FV215b 183 is about the only thing that really threatens it with credit ammo, and even then it has to hit the small area around the mantle with its derpy 0.4 accuracy.</p>
<p>THAT is why it&#8217;s so slow and unmaneuverable. A fast T95 would be overpowered, especially at tier 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted, but then that&#039;s (unfortunately) only an advantage in select situations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, but then that&#8217;s (unfortunately) only an advantage in select situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westonbirt_EU</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westonbirt_EU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can only do it every five seconds, which you might not have when you&#039;re under fire and there are a bunch of mouth-breathers hanging around. Also, the list of ignore is limited, and some people, like yours truly, have filled it already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can only do it every five seconds, which you might not have when you&#8217;re under fire and there are a bunch of mouth-breathers hanging around. Also, the list of ignore is limited, and some people, like yours truly, have filled it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolvG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolvG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aaaw but i wanna club more seals....i still havent finished my 1km Seal Carpet of Totalutter Domination T^T]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aaaw but i wanna club more seals&#8230;.i still havent finished my 1km Seal Carpet of Totalutter Domination T^T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolvG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WolvG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kept mine on. EU mindless rant is much amusing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kept mine on. EU mindless rant is much amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corvi</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/12/29/wg-stream-qa/#comment-100548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corvi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 16:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=6918#comment-100548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SS, any chance you could find out more about the Mac OS client wether there will be some public testing or where you can apply for it ? I&#039;d love to contribute on that field]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS, any chance you could find out more about the Mac OS client wether there will be some public testing or where you can apply for it ? I&#8217;d love to contribute on that field</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
