Comments on: 30.12.2013

By: Laforeta .

Laforeta . — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:14:52 +0000

They buffed the terrain resistance of the tier 9 JT (mostly to compensate for the decreased engine power) but not the premium JT88. Overall their relative mobility were the same.

They have also left the JT88 armor scheme unchanged while the regular JT now has a weaker LFP but no MG port weakspot.

By: Myth

Myth — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:53:20 +0000

SU – 122 – 44 :

Pros : Good alpha
Good pen
Good maneuverability

Cons: Bad view range
Bad aiming time
Bad accuracy
Bad armor (Relies on slope)
On the low side of HP pool ( as compared to all tier 7 TDs )
Highest suspension rotation dispersion when traversing ( of all tier 7 TDs)

So yeah, I’d say that’s pretty balanced.

By: Myth

Myth — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:34:49 +0000

The SU-122-44, it’s weakness is it’s armour, it has almost none. It relies on it’s slope for it’s protection. The gun has good alpha and pen for tier 7, but accuracy and aiming time are very bad. And with 330 view range … you have to depend alot on your team to spot unless you’re using binocs / optics. Also, what about the e25 ? Highest camo of all tier 7 TD’s, high ammo count, average alpha and pen, but it’s ROF compensates for it ( Fires every 3 seconds I think ). Good accuracy and aiming time as well. But, it too has it’s flaws such as continuous exposure to fire at enemies and almost no armour. So, the tier 7′s are pretty balanced according to me.

By: WorldsDawn

WorldsDawn — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:28:34 +0000

well… the leFH is quite good, but not OP
it’s cometitive though :)

By: WorldsDawn

WorldsDawn — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:27:02 +0000

And by some, you mean all of them :)
(Maybe the JP is a tad better, depending on playstyle) :D

By: TheCrusaderGr

TheCrusaderGr — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:31:21 +0000

it does but mobility sucks on SU 152 and is kinda fucked if you start circling it
which means su 122 44 is better on that area too

By: ComradeHX

ComradeHX — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 00:10:26 +0000

Su-122-44 is not magical either; it has even worse depression and very narrow gun traverse.

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 30 Dec 2013 23:39:26 +0000

But you can’t use that “better” dpm since the platform is a lot slower, thus, not able to flank stuff.

By: Medjed

Medjed — Mon, 30 Dec 2013 22:32:55 +0000

That one too. I just named SU-122-44 because it’s one of the most common prem tanks on the battlefield and it’s clearly OP compared to some T7 TDs

By: giocol97

giocol97 — Mon, 30 Dec 2013 21:11:07 +0000

As far as i know there wasn’t any real heavy tank in the Italian army, but we had some interesting projects and a lot of low tier tanks, other than the classic tier 1 FT17, we could do a really interesting tree for 5-6 tiers, then because of the armistice and the political moment in which Italy was, all the research on tanks stopped and we used american tanks for some years so it could go with those for tier 7-8-9 ,then we had the german leopard, as a tier 10 it could fit, we also had some good tank destroyers and ASMVs but not enough to fit a whole branch, IMO it could be some sort of tree like the japanese one, here are some links of those vehicles (i know they are in italian but they are more complete and you can use google translate ;) )
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carri_armati_italiani_fino_alla_seconda_guerra_mondiale
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carro_M_sahariano
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/149/40_(semovente)
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/L40
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.41_da_90/53
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansaldo_105/25_M.43
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_1
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansaldo_M43_da_75/46