Comments on: (Not only) CW QA with Fluke

By: WorldsDawn

WorldsDawn — Wed, 01 Jan 2014 02:52:51 +0000

I like how you refer to me as a whiner, when all i did was trying to understand other people’s reasons to complain about CW and to take a critical point of view, where it can be improved and what people might interest and what might not.

As WG clearly showed during the second CWC, they don’t like the supercluster either…

Without critique a game stagnates, and my critique is not a destructive one hating everything and tell people to stop whining…

(see what i did there?)

By: the_brick

the_brick — Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:58:43 +0000

Maybe 1:1 they could stomp another clan, but when you get to a point where no matter where you drop on a map, 4+ clans target you, and drop on any landing area you go to, yet give “technical victories” to every clan except their target, then things have gone too far.

On the SEA server, there was even a case where one clan decided that instead of trying for the VP’s needed to ensure they came first, that they would instead create an alliance in order to decide who came into the top 5, with the stated goal of denying certain clans the possibility of getting there.

And this is the sad part, where a single clan can get to a point where it is dictating what happens, and starts to actively work against other clans instead of working with clans, then [1] it’s going to deter people from any interext in clan wars.

[1] The difference is:
Working against: “We call on our allies to stop clan x and y getting into top 3 and will follow around these clans to prevent them getting there. We also call on the allies of clans X and Y to join us and break any ties they have with clan X and Y or become targets as well, not just for campaign, but after as well.”
Working with: “We intend helping to defend clan B’s land in order to help them into the top 3, and will work to stop anyone taking their land.”

By: Foxton

Foxton — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:30:39 +0000

As much as this news disappoints me, everyone assumed it would happen when the question of “Will the M60 be exclusive” got no official answer, though I assumed it would be available for gold. I guess that shows the faith I have in WG.

By: A_hardy_buck

A_hardy_buck — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:45:00 +0000

Was in the same clan as Xen , played 16 battles in total and was on position 10500 before we got the fame points for missions. So 20 battles over the entire campaign should be enough

By: Xensation WOT EU

Xensation WOT EU — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:44:49 +0000

Quit whining, really. Even without an alliance those clans would stomp you easily. The problem aren’t the “big communities/alliances”, the problem is that bad clans are not good enough. Nobody can help them with that.

By: Xensation WOT EU

Xensation WOT EU — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:41:57 +0000

Does it even matter? Sure, you won’t be able to expand much, but you don’t need to. Just sit on the map and spam attacks, try to win as often as possible. More enemies = more FP.

By: Xensation WOT EU

Xensation WOT EU — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:40:26 +0000

It’s not like they turn battles into 15vs30 or something. More battles = more FP = easier tank. ZER0 had no problem with the green bobs zerging (and failing).

By: Xensation WOT EU

Xensation WOT EU — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:38:48 +0000

Good player => good stats.
However, good stats =/=> good player.

By: Xensation WOT EU

Xensation WOT EU — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:37:39 +0000

Even without the x5 rate it should have been easily doable if you were “active”. And to be honest, good players in good clans were supposed to win. If you cannot land, you aren’t good. It’s simple.

By: OO

OO — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:00:04 +0000

Which just means that your clan did landing missions, took land during the first stage and then you either played a lot of battles on your own provinces or fought a lot with province owners.

Participating in battle for revolts and landing provinces provides players with x1 rate for Victory Points, aside from final battles with province owners. Those battles have x5 rate for Fame Points.