<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On IS-4 model accuracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: L0rd_0f_War</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L0rd_0f_War]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IS4 would be just fine if they gave it slightly better mobility and gun depression of -8... the same as ST1. HP is fine and giving it even more is not the solution. If you look at the new ratings charts, IS4 is one of the most under performing tier 10 tanks, and driving it makes it feel like an underdog, far more than the IS7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IS4 would be just fine if they gave it slightly better mobility and gun depression of -8&#8230; the same as ST1. HP is fine and giving it even more is not the solution. If you look at the new ratings charts, IS4 is one of the most under performing tier 10 tanks, and driving it makes it feel like an underdog, far more than the IS7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pussukka</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pussukka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, but ST-I&#039;s armor is at 64 degrees when IS-4&#039;s is at 60.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but ST-I&#8217;s armor is at 64 degrees when IS-4&#8242;s is at 60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IS-4 frontal armour is at 61 degrees.

Only buffs I can imagine are mobility and maybe turret top buffs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS-4 frontal armour is at 61 degrees.</p>
<p>Only buffs I can imagine are mobility and maybe turret top buffs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cant say really. Maybe you are right, maybe you are not.  The hull was also made a little longer.

Turret was nerfed though. No one was shooting next to the mantlet anyway. Side armour can be fel though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant say really. Maybe you are right, maybe you are not.  The hull was also made a little longer.</p>
<p>Turret was nerfed though. No one was shooting next to the mantlet anyway. Side armour can be fel though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pussukka</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pussukka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should give it that 60 degree frontal armor, not 500 more HP, but more HP and maybe better mobility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should give it that 60 degree frontal armor, not 500 more HP, but more HP and maybe better mobility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCrusaderGr</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheCrusaderGr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is3&#039;s hull was the one that was on game before the change they did to so called historical adjusment 
they only thing they did which is historical is the turret the hull mustn&#039;t have been changed at all
why they bother going into this unessesary change on the hull??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is3&#8242;s hull was the one that was on game before the change they did to so called historical adjusment<br />
they only thing they did which is historical is the turret the hull mustn&#8217;t have been changed at all<br />
why they bother going into this unessesary change on the hull??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zlig</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zlig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agree, i sold my ST-I only to find out the IS-4 is tier 9 tank... they have no respect to Russian Tanks, they mess it up, IS-4 should be Invisible. 

PS - it&#039;s very good if you can side scrap, but still they should buff it&#039;s frontal armor badly and give it 500 moar HP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree, i sold my ST-I only to find out the IS-4 is tier 9 tank&#8230; they have no respect to Russian Tanks, they mess it up, IS-4 should be Invisible. </p>
<p>PS &#8211; it&#8217;s very good if you can side scrap, but still they should buff it&#8217;s frontal armor badly and give it 500 moar HP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IS-3 has completely wrong lower plate angles compared to RL version. In game it&#039;s retardedly sloped under extreme angle while in RL it wasn&#039;t nowhere near as much as angled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS-3 has completely wrong lower plate angles compared to RL version. In game it&#8217;s retardedly sloped under extreme angle while in RL it wasn&#8217;t nowhere near as much as angled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pussukka</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pussukka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C&#039;mon already, fix the IS-4, the ST-I has like 3-4 degrees better sloping on the UHP which makes about 20mm more effective armor on the ST-I. Also the ST-I doesn&#039;t suffer from the weak turret top, and IS4 has that weak turret top along with the IS-3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon already, fix the IS-4, the ST-I has like 3-4 degrees better sloping on the UHP which makes about 20mm more effective armor on the ST-I. Also the ST-I doesn&#8217;t suffer from the weak turret top, and IS4 has that weak turret top along with the IS-3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/02/on-is-4-model-accuracy/#comment-101706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7010#comment-101706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are not inaccurate, they correspond to factory values.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not inaccurate, they correspond to factory values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
