<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Need more dakka!&#8221; &#8211; German Flak Panzers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xelos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-103214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xelos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-103214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool tanks great article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool tanks great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kennung</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-103153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kennung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-103153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;while British and Americans also put 76mm high velocity cannons to good use on the other side.&quot;

Actually the Tiger Abteilungen pretty much laughed hard about almost all the British and American tanks and their weak guns. They were not able to penetrate their armor. Same with the T-34/76 (T-34 ingame), the soviet standard tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;while British and Americans also put 76mm high velocity cannons to good use on the other side.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually the Tiger Abteilungen pretty much laughed hard about almost all the British and American tanks and their weak guns. They were not able to penetrate their armor. Same with the T-34/76 (T-34 ingame), the soviet standard tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mini_Bolo .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-103055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mini_Bolo .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-103055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see the Porsche design uses the same suspension and bogie type as the Maus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the Porsche design uses the same suspension and bogie type as the Maus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdwardTeach</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-103029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EdwardTeach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 15:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-103029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chamberlain &amp; Doyle go as low as two ( maybe 5 ) and Hart &amp; Hart also keep it at 5]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chamberlain &amp; Doyle go as low as two ( maybe 5 ) and Hart &amp; Hart also keep it at 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-102999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-102999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[140mm is the uranium round, can&#039;t get better than that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>140mm is the uranium round, can&#8217;t get better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turarwanaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-102992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turarwanaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-102992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which P-47 happens to be a dedicated carrier of. :) Also, its shower of .50 cal might not penetrate the heavy&#039;s armoring but would probably reap apart all &quot;soft&quot; exterior elements, and for sure deafen the entire crew ! Also, Tiger&#039;s roof stayed 25mm think until 1944, many aircraft carried guns could defeat such a thickness, IIRC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which P-47 happens to be a dedicated carrier of. :) Also, its shower of .50 cal might not penetrate the heavy&#8217;s armoring but would probably reap apart all &#8220;soft&#8221; exterior elements, and for sure deafen the entire crew ! Also, Tiger&#8217;s roof stayed 25mm think until 1944, many aircraft carried guns could defeat such a thickness, IIRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turarwanaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-102991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turarwanaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-102991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[APCR as standard ammo, or &quot;newly discovered better pen ammo&quot; (as on many premiums) can also be a very good solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APCR as standard ammo, or &#8220;newly discovered better pen ammo&#8221; (as on many premiums) can also be a very good solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turarwanaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-102990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turarwanaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-102990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talking about grammer : isn&#039;t it a mistake to write &quot;necessery&quot; as SS always does ? or is it maybe an intended pun ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about grammer : isn&#8217;t it a mistake to write &#8220;necessery&#8221; as SS always does ? or is it maybe an intended pun ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turarwanaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-102988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turarwanaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-102988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those IL-2s are finally going to suffer !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those IL-2s are finally going to suffer !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Tiger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/need-more-dakka-german-flak-panzers/#comment-102939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[King Tiger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7068#comment-102939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find these infos very useful,thanks SS :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find these infos very useful,thanks SS :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
