<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Wargaming promotion of fakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominatus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominatus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2014 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, Conqueror SPG is the FV207, in game. BC-155 55 was the original French plan to build the thing on the M47 chassis, never materialised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Conqueror SPG is the FV207, in game. BC-155 55 was the original French plan to build the thing on the M47 chassis, never materialised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Parker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 23:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a reply!
But. That&#039;s what to expect from foreigners]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a reply!<br />
But. That&#8217;s what to expect from foreigners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy87</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lumpy87]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 23:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow you are some kind of &quot;model snop&quot; or something. All i meant was i didnt know of this company before and i didnt see the fail loewe anywere to buy. And i fucking know that they arent for beginners. Fuck off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you are some kind of &#8220;model snop&#8221; or something. All i meant was i didnt know of this company before and i didnt see the fail loewe anywere to buy. And i fucking know that they arent for beginners. Fuck off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Parker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the sounds of it you&#039;ve never made a model before nd like the box art so you want to make it.
Well no!
Its not for a beginner, I&#039;ve built 2 and they are heard for me and I&#039;ve made hundreds of models.
So no site recommendations for you, ungrateful foreigner!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the sounds of it you&#8217;ve never made a model before nd like the box art so you want to make it.<br />
Well no!<br />
Its not for a beginner, I&#8217;ve built 2 and they are heard for me and I&#8217;ve made hundreds of models.<br />
So no site recommendations for you, ungrateful foreigner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles "Tails" Prower</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miles "Tails" Prower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s more sloped though, so that increases the Tank Armors effectiveness by quite a bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more sloped though, so that increases the Tank Armors effectiveness by quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr3awsome</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr3awsome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not entirely true, the Russians built larger capital ship classes than the United States, Italy and France up until the South Dakota 1939 for the USA, the others never matched it, in terms of ships completed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not entirely true, the Russians built larger capital ship classes than the United States, Italy and France up until the South Dakota 1939 for the USA, the others never matched it, in terms of ships completed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr3awsome</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr3awsome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had a comparatively lower combat capacity. Saying it had no capacity is overlooking 3 battleships, 7 cruisers and 59 destroyer leaders and destroyers (vessels not in WoWS have been omitted.)

There were also several under construction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had a comparatively lower combat capacity. Saying it had no capacity is overlooking 3 battleships, 7 cruisers and 59 destroyer leaders and destroyers (vessels not in WoWS have been omitted.)</p>
<p>There were also several under construction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 113</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[113]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 17:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also give anything which shows that 155-55 is historical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also give anything which shows that 155-55 is historical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 113</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[113]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 17:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conqueror GC is 100% WG&#039;s creation.
SPG on conqueror chassis was 165mm conqueror avre, almost nothing else is know from this thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conqueror GC is 100% WG&#8217;s creation.<br />
SPG on conqueror chassis was 165mm conqueror avre, almost nothing else is know from this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleipnir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/04/on-wargaming-promotion-of-fakes/#comment-102645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sleipnir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7046#comment-102645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[month ago i asked here how they manage to implement the light lion as T10 whils the heavy one is only T8.
its obviously phantasy garbage. in WoT i like if they bring blueprints to life but not this phantasy shit like this.
also the WT E100 or FV215 ....

thats just to bring another WTF tank that everybody wants.
and WG plan sucesses. look whoch much 45%-Noobs driving arround the WT E100 yet ... all with converted XP $$$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>month ago i asked here how they manage to implement the light lion as T10 whils the heavy one is only T8.<br />
its obviously phantasy garbage. in WoT i like if they bring blueprints to life but not this phantasy shit like this.<br />
also the WT E100 or FV215 &#8230;.</p>
<p>thats just to bring another WTF tank that everybody wants.<br />
and WG plan sucesses. look whoch much 45%-Noobs driving arround the WT E100 yet &#8230; all with converted XP $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
