Comments on: 6.1.2014

By: kerradeph

kerradeph — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 02:12:19 +0000

I’m more interested for it with the WT turreted line, and the E50/M.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 01:32:51 +0000

That’s because it IS too easy, because it rewards how many times you hit the target, when it SHOULD, imho, reward somebody for scoring a hit on a target at a range further than anyone else in the battle, not counting SPGs.

By: |VA|Wolfenworks/WolvG

|VA|Wolfenworks/WolvG — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 21:01:40 +0000

I’m hoping they give an alternate IS-2 hull for the russian IS tank. IS-2 hull more bouncy than shitty IS hull.

By: Quineloe

Quineloe — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:13:37 +0000

- the render range will change from (current) square with a 1000 meter side to a circle of 700m radius

huge buff to passive scouting on certain maps.

Also, WG repeatedly lied about this being impossible or requiring too much computing power…

By: Marius Czyz

Marius Czyz — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:52:14 +0000

Statistics is build up from the data uploaded the last 30 days (1.7 Mio Battle Results atm).

By: adampurkis

adampurkis — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:36:30 +0000

Just because the one in bogington had the 85 doesnt mean that was it. A lot of information around the internet say the same thing that tank was a test platform for modules used on the chieftain for all we know they might have even tried the chieftain turret on that. Who on earth cares anyway WOT so is so far from being historically accurate half the tanks never even existed look at the fv215 heavy that never existed it was only designed to have the 183 and be a td. They just keep keep hte 1o5 on the fv 42 butff the turret armor speed and reload time.

By: Rayxanber

Rayxanber — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:31:21 +0000

That’s the whole point of nerfing the low-alpha TX 850-guns. A gun with 850 alpha can cut you for more than 1k hp.
That’s what is OP. I won’t be surprised if the don’t touch the heavy guns (183 and Jg100) at all, since they are relatively PLAYABLE. Nerfing them will make them completely unplayable, with jg100 being one of the worst out there.

By: Rayxanber

Rayxanber — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:00:25 +0000

TBH though, is it REALLY that needed of a feature?
I’ve been playing way since 2009 and…honestly – i don’t really need it anymore, since they removed the crap that always pointed out 132%-stats on the modules.
New players that don’t know – won’t notice.
New players that know – have knowledge of WHAT the equipment does, hence, they know that over half of the equipment out there is utter crap
Old players…well…it does matter how skilled you are (as in, mounting a rammer on a t50-2 was crap and all), but in most cases they already know what to add to maximize the performance with their play-style.

By: Борис Иванов

Борис Иванов — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:27:36 +0000

One Moar:
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/2514/kirovec1shema.jpg

By: Борис Иванов

Борис Иванов — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 07:25:49 +0000

IS3 without its nose was the early prototype called “Kirovetz-1″ (Not sure of its English transcription)
Looks kinda similar to 112:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110222091316/http://www.otvaga2004.narod.ru/publ_w4/is3/21.jpg
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1021/kirovec1morda.jpg
http://war1945.ru/uploads/posts/2011-04/1303129914_kirovec-1.jpg
http://worldoftanks.ru/dcont/fb/uncommon_images/history_section/1341572721_17-3.jpg