Comments on: Straight outta Supertest – T95E6

By: ramp4ge

ramp4ge — Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:38:13 +0000

So basically

“Hey, we screwed up. We realize the M60′s shit for CW. Here, try this tank instead!”

How many times are they going to rob the general playerbase of a very anticipated vehicle before they actually give the CW minority something they’ll actually use for a few weeks before the next flavor-of-the-month comes out?

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:55:22 +0000

Another CW reward tank, huh?

Well that would be all fine and dandy…if it wasn’t always the same clans winning them every time.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Fri, 10 Jan 2014 04:49:04 +0000

And can you prove that you’re any better, or are in a better clan? No? Well, that’s too bad then.

By: Outlawsundown

Outlawsundown — Thu, 09 Jan 2014 04:57:08 +0000

Yeah I really feel that Wargaming has gotten off track with this. The T95 and M60 should be T10s in the US tech tree not reward tanks for clan wars. The T95E6 would at least give the US tree a different flavor as far as the gun goes for a T10 medium.

If they want to do reward tanks they should be doing stuff from countries that pretty much won’t get a tree anyway or even export versions of some tanks. What they’re currently doing just seems to be incredibly short sighted.

By: Sleipnir

Sleipnir — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:50:15 +0000

yes, but with its real stats it would be a T8 max.

By: jakub_czyli_ja

jakub_czyli_ja — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:25:09 +0000

Don’t standard WoT clients watermark also?

In such case it doesn’t really matter which client was used.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:49:50 +0000

Yeah CW is mostly 30 mins per night since you get there when battles pop 15 mins before.
Still this is easily done.

Even though I dont like the way Reward tanks work, saying CW is meaningless and that its impossible to get a tank is simply lazyness or a hope in changing WG`s mind so players can be bad.

Getting into a Clan takes skill and work.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:47:19 +0000

No but the T95 had one less roadwheel than 110. Also that is E5`s turret so look how it is in comparison.

T96 was also 42ish tons vs Pattons much fatter. Patton was much taller and much bigger by 20%

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:24:29 +0000

E6 wasnt the most unique IMO. The later ones with smaller E6 turret ans the tested 105mm SB was. Designations changed throughout.

But collectors tanks is all they are good for. M60 is HUGE and has no armor.

It`s basically a M48. Now if it was A1 I`d say that was messed up, but fact is reward tanks arent best at all.

How many clans use M60 in CW? None
How man VK`s? Not many
Obj 907? It will never be with slow aimtime and 219 pen

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:21:15 +0000

Why shouldnt Reward tanks be viable CW tanks?

It makes sense that CW tanks are for CW. T10 in general is useless to Pubbies, they cost money and Pubbies as a whole suck in them.

Lastly M60 is not better than the T62a or O140 and is totally outclassed by the STB1. The VK is great but only in skiled hands it blows otherwise, its 2k DPM is lowest in class bar none, hell T9`s out DMG it. Obj 907 is gonna suck with a T54 gun and similiar armor at T10….Basically a T54.

I agree T96 is amazing but TBH I doubt they will make it great.