<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 17.1.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinderschlager</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-108329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinderschlager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-108329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i don&#039;t see multi-core support coming till mid 2015 at the earliest]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t see multi-core support coming till mid 2015 at the earliest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 30K</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-108259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[30K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-108259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that picture looks fake to me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that picture looks fake to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Shoulzhenko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-108192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Shoulzhenko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-108192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;ve played every Russian heavy and, to be honest, like KB-1C the least. I also seem to have the worst record on it. (But hey, Hellcat was aweful too, i much more preferred 25/2.).

Tier 7 will be dominated by Tiger I (s) though. I feel that, since last buff, its soooo overpowereed (RoF buff ? on already AWESOME gun ? HP Buff in line with T8 HT ?). Now im playing through China line and i dread Tigers on top when im on IS-2 as, 1 on 1, its a sure road back to hangar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve played every Russian heavy and, to be honest, like KB-1C the least. I also seem to have the worst record on it. (But hey, Hellcat was aweful too, i much more preferred 25/2.).</p>
<p>Tier 7 will be dominated by Tiger I (s) though. I feel that, since last buff, its soooo overpowereed (RoF buff ? on already AWESOME gun ? HP Buff in line with T8 HT ?). Now im playing through China line and i dread Tigers on top when im on IS-2 as, 1 on 1, its a sure road back to hangar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-108010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-108010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAT FRENCH GEAR]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAT FRENCH GEAR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-108007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-108007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cant tell....i dont own a jagtig88]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cant tell&#8230;.i dont own a jagtig88</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-108006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#124;VA&#124;Wolfenworks/WolvG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-108006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why so?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holger Hofmann</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-107870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holger Hofmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-107870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mature people and/or Dutch will allways think &#039;DAF&#039; whenever they will see/drive the T23. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mature people and/or Dutch will allways think &#8216;DAF&#8217; whenever they will see/drive the T23. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yowanx7</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-107869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yowanx7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-107869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That only applies to the physics, not the graphics themselves. That&#039;s not really how this kind of thing works. There are multiple Havok packages that do different things. There&#039;s Havok Vision, Havok Physics, Havok Destruction, Havok AI, Havok Animation, and Havok Cloth. They all have different fuctions. If Wargaming were adopting Havok Vision that would mean replacing BigWorld with a new engine but that&#039;s not what they&#039;re doing. The parts of Havok that they&#039;re implementing appears to be the physics engine and the destruction toolset. Maybe Havok&#039;s AI toolset too since they said there might eventually be AI in historical battles.

Essentially, they&#039;re implementing the Havok physics engine within BigWorld, which is still going to be handling all the rendering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That only applies to the physics, not the graphics themselves. That&#8217;s not really how this kind of thing works. There are multiple Havok packages that do different things. There&#8217;s Havok Vision, Havok Physics, Havok Destruction, Havok AI, Havok Animation, and Havok Cloth. They all have different fuctions. If Wargaming were adopting Havok Vision that would mean replacing BigWorld with a new engine but that&#8217;s not what they&#8217;re doing. The parts of Havok that they&#8217;re implementing appears to be the physics engine and the destruction toolset. Maybe Havok&#8217;s AI toolset too since they said there might eventually be AI in historical battles.</p>
<p>Essentially, they&#8217;re implementing the Havok physics engine within BigWorld, which is still going to be handling all the rendering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yowanx7</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-107868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yowanx7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 09:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-107868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And DX11 too, since it&#039;s natively optimized for multi-threaded instructions on multiple cores compared to the inefficient DX9 which simply deprecated, not to mention that cards stuck with that dated API have long been discontinued by manufacturers. Multi-core without DX11 will be useless
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff476891%28v=vs.85%29.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And DX11 too, since it&#8217;s natively optimized for multi-threaded instructions on multiple cores compared to the inefficient DX9 which simply deprecated, not to mention that cards stuck with that dated API have long been discontinued by manufacturers. Multi-core without DX11 will be useless<br />
<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff476891%28v=vs.85%29.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff476891%28v=vs.85%29.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenryuu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/17/17-1-2014/#comment-107867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tenryuu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7516#comment-107867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russian will rule Tier VI in National Battle For sure....

But, keep it mind that KV-1S is like a blind bat....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian will rule Tier VI in National Battle For sure&#8230;.</p>
<p>But, keep it mind that KV-1S is like a blind bat&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
