Comments on: 22.1.2014

By: HowTerrible

HowTerrible — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:51:01 +0000

- Q: “How come you nerfed arty instead of putting a hardcap on it?” A: “Idiotic solutions like a hardcap have no support in Wargaming – we try not to hire morons as employees”

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

By: your Night MARE

your Night MARE — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:13:45 +0000

How many shots?

By: your Night MARE

your Night MARE — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:12:19 +0000

Most people would wait for great MM..and for classic, indirect fire, the way the arty nerf went was in a completely different approach.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:47:25 +0000

The only reason it might be considered “idiotic” is because the RU server LOVES arty, and would be really pissed off if a hardcap were implemented, and because RU is the only server that WG listens to, they get their way.

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:49:16 +0000

- Q: “Will it be possible to appear with a Tiger in a national battle Soviet team?” A: “You consider us to be retards or something…”

Why not? The Germans and Soviets routinely pulled false-flag operations on each other (the Battle of Kursk comes to mind as an example, where captured T-34s were used to harrass Soviet tank columns), and it wasn’t unheard-of for captured vehicles to be repainted and placed into front line service – for example, the Germans had the Panzerkampfwagen 735 (r): a captured KV-1, and the Soviets had the T-4: a captured Panzer IV.

By: Xelos

Xelos — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:22:58 +0000

- SerB thinks that what Veider said about the T23 premium tank (SS: it was historically able to go backward as fast as forward) is garbage, a player later argues it was historical, but SerB states that it’s the developers who decide what is realistic in the game and that he will specifically tell Veider not to do such a thing

KV-1S with great gun depression realistic? Your employees are retards until this is fixed.

By: Vlkodlak

Vlkodlak — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:46:02 +0000

tried and failed miserably…

By: Sl8

Sl8 — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:19:28 +0000

There must be a reason why you aren’t, and never shall you be the boss of SerB or any other game developer.
You just can’t see the bigger picture in which hard capping ONE vehicle type affects ALL vehicle types in ways it is almost impossible to consider.
If you were to risk screwing the entire MM mechanism just for the sake of a retarded argument then your hypothetical game would flop really fast.

By: Sl8

Sl8 — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:16:21 +0000

It’s not actually a capped limit. They force you to change the setup loadout of your tank for a template one with a fixed number of gold shells in order to participate in historical battles. You won’t have that for standard randoms because then you wouldn’t be able to customize your loadout pre battle. You can’t have a “cap” on gold shells without having a cap on every other type of shell, and nobody would want that.

By: Hrothgar

Hrothgar — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:33:04 +0000

Silent Stalker, i have IV tier medium japanese tank, and it’s gun is awful. Cant penetrate any V tier heavy (even T1…) , armor and other things are not bad. But a little more penetration for this tank should be done. Now it’s a only ding dong cannon.