<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8.11 tier 10 TD  changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: juanjo_dpr9</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-112449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[juanjo_dpr9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-112449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still we don&#039;t have either a Hellcat nerf or T18 nerf. Nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still we don&#8217;t have either a Hellcat nerf or T18 nerf. Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullMetalJacket</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-112120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FullMetalJacket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-112120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll just commit my 390 alpha at tier 6 crime with the SU-100. :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just commit my 390 alpha at tier 6 crime with the SU-100. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTuberKnownAsMe .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTuberKnownAsMe .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My logic is fine, I guess. But how about yours?

A merry nerf-go-round where each class takes a turn is not the solution, thats what I&#039;m saying. Where do you think vehicles in this game will be in about a year or so, if WG were to follow your vision? 

Think about it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My logic is fine, I guess. But how about yours?</p>
<p>A merry nerf-go-round where each class takes a turn is not the solution, thats what I&#8217;m saying. Where do you think vehicles in this game will be in about a year or so, if WG were to follow your vision? </p>
<p>Think about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: korpakukac</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[korpakukac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonder which one I should sell...
Foch155 or Obj268...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder which one I should sell&#8230;<br />
Foch155 or Obj268&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin4x4</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martin4x4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. I do not own any T10 TD an yet I see no point in such punishment for Foch. Some nerf is ok, it can not have mobility armor and gun, but to take it all away? That is cruel. Regarding upcoming complete TD class nerf - I worry about it. As you say, they are lost when it comes to balancing. It can not be that they do it only for money which they may get from grinding and converting. People will be doing the same no matter if they convert for TD or Heavy. A player is either that mad or that rich that he will spend money on that or he wont. 

Same was with arty nerf. They nerfed it to the ground, which may have balanced some, but other are useless. I neither have T10 arty but I understand why people complained about it. Especially low tier ones. What if same happens to TDs now? Or will they make it rng dependant like for example GW Tiger P? You either kill with 2000 dmg or wont hit anything the whole battle. It is sure fun for that GW driver and also for that full dmg victim. Now both suffer. 
If they stepped in and dealt with particullar OP TD in the beginning, none of this would happen. Of course number of people grinding TDs increase on all tiers. It takes time for hundreds of thousands players to grind to T10. Some do it in month, some in a year...

------------------------------------
TL; DR :
------------------------------------
WG should finally decide which class will they favor and which in their eyes should form the bulk of battles. Make it heavy, medium if they want, or even lights or TDs, it is their choice, but till they choose one class for &quot;mainstream use&quot;/&quot;general issue&quot;, this circle of nerfs will never end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I do not own any T10 TD an yet I see no point in such punishment for Foch. Some nerf is ok, it can not have mobility armor and gun, but to take it all away? That is cruel. Regarding upcoming complete TD class nerf &#8211; I worry about it. As you say, they are lost when it comes to balancing. It can not be that they do it only for money which they may get from grinding and converting. People will be doing the same no matter if they convert for TD or Heavy. A player is either that mad or that rich that he will spend money on that or he wont. </p>
<p>Same was with arty nerf. They nerfed it to the ground, which may have balanced some, but other are useless. I neither have T10 arty but I understand why people complained about it. Especially low tier ones. What if same happens to TDs now? Or will they make it rng dependant like for example GW Tiger P? You either kill with 2000 dmg or wont hit anything the whole battle. It is sure fun for that GW driver and also for that full dmg victim. Now both suffer.<br />
If they stepped in and dealt with particullar OP TD in the beginning, none of this would happen. Of course number of people grinding TDs increase on all tiers. It takes time for hundreds of thousands players to grind to T10. Some do it in month, some in a year&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
TL; DR :<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
WG should finally decide which class will they favor and which in their eyes should form the bulk of battles. Make it heavy, medium if they want, or even lights or TDs, it is their choice, but till they choose one class for &#8220;mainstream use&#8221;/&#8221;general issue&#8221;, this circle of nerfs will never end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yurra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A step in the right direction towards better balance on tier 10, however there still are some things done wrong:

I am glad they nerfed Object 268&#039;s DPM, however T110 TDs did not need a DPM nerf as well. 
Yet again, nothing was done to FV 183&#039;s HESH. 
Foch was nerfed too hard, the armor nerf was totally unnecessary. Maybe they should revert the engine nerf to re-compensate?
WT E-100....that is not a nerf. IMO they should increase autoloading time to 3 seconds, 4 seconds for 150mm and nerf aimtime and accuracy for 128mm to reasonable values. But WG won&#039;t nerf it seriously as long as it acts as a cash cow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A step in the right direction towards better balance on tier 10, however there still are some things done wrong:</p>
<p>I am glad they nerfed Object 268&#8242;s DPM, however T110 TDs did not need a DPM nerf as well.<br />
Yet again, nothing was done to FV 183&#8242;s HESH.<br />
Foch was nerfed too hard, the armor nerf was totally unnecessary. Maybe they should revert the engine nerf to re-compensate?<br />
WT E-100&#8230;.that is not a nerf. IMO they should increase autoloading time to 3 seconds, 4 seconds for 150mm and nerf aimtime and accuracy for 128mm to reasonable values. But WG won&#8217;t nerf it seriously as long as it acts as a cash cow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conagor</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conagor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[guess most of all the whiners here don&#039;t even own one of the nerfed vehicles. sadly crying is always easier than learning...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guess most of all the whiners here don&#8217;t even own one of the nerfed vehicles. sadly crying is always easier than learning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauschen04</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauschen04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 07:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; WG knew it for sure
I&#039;ve heard the same story out of TF2 when they introduced the Equalizer. It&#039;s a tier 10 tank destroyer with exceptionally odd weaknesses (long reload, no armor, size: house, backyard support)  that players needed to account for in the metagame: There needs to be some reason why you&#039;d pick it over the Foch 155&#039;s massive front plate, shorter stature, and incredible penetration.

They&#039;re at minimum just as likely to have considered that the WT E-100&#039;s metagame would have taken getting used to before they&#039;d think about actual balance, because a small subset of the population on an all tier 10 test server isn&#039;t the same as the general population server. I also think they didn&#039;t believe TDs were bad until the data trends after the artillery nerf came in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; WG knew it for sure<br />
I&#8217;ve heard the same story out of TF2 when they introduced the Equalizer. It&#8217;s a tier 10 tank destroyer with exceptionally odd weaknesses (long reload, no armor, size: house, backyard support)  that players needed to account for in the metagame: There needs to be some reason why you&#8217;d pick it over the Foch 155&#8242;s massive front plate, shorter stature, and incredible penetration.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re at minimum just as likely to have considered that the WT E-100&#8242;s metagame would have taken getting used to before they&#8217;d think about actual balance, because a small subset of the population on an all tier 10 test server isn&#8217;t the same as the general population server. I also think they didn&#8217;t believe TDs were bad until the data trends after the artillery nerf came in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...why serb states WG wont react on any petition, while they do react on RUSSIAN forum whinners who can’t play against TDs...&quot;

*fixed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;why serb states WG wont react on any petition, while they do react on RUSSIAN forum whinners who can’t play against TDs&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>*fixed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/24/8-11-tier-10-td-changes/#comment-111079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 00:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7773#comment-111079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until new vehicles are added, throwing balance off again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until new vehicles are added, throwing balance off again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
