<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Archives II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HappyBallz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HappyBallz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure what T-60 has to do with T-54 but I don&#039;t see anything wrong with trying IS-8&#039;s turret on it...just like T95E6 case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what T-60 has to do with T-54 but I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with trying IS-8&#8242;s turret on it&#8230;just like T95E6 case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Stefanescu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Stefanescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maus for scale : http://imgur.com/db5UqRX]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maus for scale : <a href="http://imgur.com/db5UqRX" rel="nofollow">http://imgur.com/db5UqRX</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Stefanescu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Stefanescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update:http://imgur.com/SrsL1it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update:<a href="http://imgur.com/SrsL1it" rel="nofollow">http://imgur.com/SrsL1it</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron_Tsunami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron_Tsunami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa, I now have the sudden urge to go back in time to propose a design to this &quot;Russian invention committee&quot;. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, I now have the sudden urge to go back in time to propose a design to this &#8220;Russian invention committee&#8221;. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Stefanescu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Stefanescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a wip: http://imgur.com/Y9y3rId]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a wip: <a href="http://imgur.com/Y9y3rId" rel="nofollow">http://imgur.com/Y9y3rId</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Stefanescu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Stefanescu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I moved the flamethrower up to the driver&#039;s compartment as it is on the Churchill Crocodile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I moved the flamethrower up to the driver&#8217;s compartment as it is on the Churchill Crocodile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good luck with that, though I&#039;ll admit that it&#039;ll be quite interesting to see the result.

Hell, I might make an attempt myself - I mean, I&#039;ve come up with crazier ideas for tanks before, which from an engineering perspective are actually feasible (but not necessarily practical).

Three-track suspension&#039;s going to be quite difficult, admittedly, but I can see the merit of the idea: it would distribute the weight of the vehicle more evenly, yielding better cross-country performance, but the complicated maintenance process would be a pain in the ass.

The feature that really comes across as the most stupid, however, is having a flamethrower sitting right on top of the engine, mounted in the front; that would have to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with that, though I&#8217;ll admit that it&#8217;ll be quite interesting to see the result.</p>
<p>Hell, I might make an attempt myself &#8211; I mean, I&#8217;ve come up with crazier ideas for tanks before, which from an engineering perspective are actually feasible (but not necessarily practical).</p>
<p>Three-track suspension&#8217;s going to be quite difficult, admittedly, but I can see the merit of the idea: it would distribute the weight of the vehicle more evenly, yielding better cross-country performance, but the complicated maintenance process would be a pain in the ass.</p>
<p>The feature that really comes across as the most stupid, however, is having a flamethrower sitting right on top of the engine, mounted in the front; that would have to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lovechild of the T-35 and AMX-40?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lovechild of the T-35 and AMX-40?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No kidding.  The Sentinel (in its Mk.I form) would have been at least equal to the Crusader in performance (and as such could have handled any tank that the Japanese actually fielded in significant numbers during the war), and had they gotten the six-pounder gun that was originally specified rather than the two-pounder they got, the Australians could have had a tank comparable to the Cromwell.  So much wasted potential...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding.  The Sentinel (in its Mk.I form) would have been at least equal to the Crusader in performance (and as such could have handled any tank that the Japanese actually fielded in significant numbers during the war), and had they gotten the six-pounder gun that was originally specified rather than the two-pounder they got, the Australians could have had a tank comparable to the Cromwell.  So much wasted potential&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/29/australian-archives-ii/#comment-112388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=7953#comment-112388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An elongated T-54 chassis could have worked (with improved suspension to handle the extra weight, and perhaps a more powerful), but not as proposed in the drawing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An elongated T-54 chassis could have worked (with improved suspension to handle the extra weight, and perhaps a more powerful), but not as proposed in the drawing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
