<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Archives V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: soviet990</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soviet990]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems tant Russians also built flying tanks in WWII ,but for transport only:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems tant Russians also built flying tanks in WWII ,but for transport only:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The A-10 is still considered the best aircraft built for the Job.

Although your list forgot the Ju-87 A,B,C. D model onward lost the dive brakes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The A-10 is still considered the best aircraft built for the Job.</p>
<p>Although your list forgot the Ju-87 A,B,C. D model onward lost the dive brakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just get rid of all the tank features, place the cannon on the underside, and you&#039;d have a helicopter gunship twenty years before they entered service in any sort of numbers irl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just get rid of all the tank features, place the cannon on the underside, and you&#8217;d have a helicopter gunship twenty years before they entered service in any sort of numbers irl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 22:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Soviets did it, twice

Ilyushin:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il-2

Mil:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi-24


And then the US one-upped them with this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-10]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Soviets did it, twice</p>
<p>Ilyushin:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il-2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il-2</a></p>
<p>Mil:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi-24" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi-24</a></p>
<p>And then the US one-upped them with this:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-10" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-10</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmaco</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tmaco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 20:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read  Ralph Peters novel &quot; The war in 2020&quot; it has. US army task force of flying tanks that look like this things great grand children.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read  Ralph Peters novel &#8221; The war in 2020&#8243; it has. US army task force of flying tanks that look like this things great grand children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the glass is in frames it could be bullet proof glass. 

If the rear prop was rotated so that it pushed the tank-coptor rather then how it is now it would be a workable design but the tracks are a lot of dead weight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the glass is in frames it could be bullet proof glass. </p>
<p>If the rear prop was rotated so that it pushed the tank-coptor rather then how it is now it would be a workable design but the tracks are a lot of dead weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vollketten</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vollketten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like the look of this one. Skip the rotors and tail and the (ahem) glass cockpit and its not a terrible looking light tank.
Quite why twin rotors AND a tail were envisaged I cannot fathom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the look of this one. Skip the rotors and tail and the (ahem) glass cockpit and its not a terrible looking light tank.<br />
Quite why twin rotors AND a tail were envisaged I cannot fathom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s going to be the Hind Model 1945.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s going to be the Hind Model 1945.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They could be so timed. It was done by the UK, Germany and the US during the war...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could be so timed. It was done by the UK, Germany and the US during the war&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sevchenko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/australian-archives-v/#comment-113424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevchenko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8105#comment-113424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget about Mil. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-24]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about Mil. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-24" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-24</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
