<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storm asks about 8.11 FOV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TankaTed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TankaTed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 17:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the td nerf comes, I will take my bathtub to the front lines. He doesn&#039;t move too well, so relocating will be a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the td nerf comes, I will take my bathtub to the front lines. He doesn&#8217;t move too well, so relocating will be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ioan Constantin</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ioan Constantin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not true. On the US servers, 66% (2/3 games) of the time you are bottom tier save for tier 1, 2 and limited mm tanks. 

Furthermore the tier ratio is generally skewed, where top tiers are dominant, while the lower tiers are fewer in number. This should not happen, and tiers should be more evenly spread in a game, with at least a ratio of 1:3 or less (i.e. 5 top tier tanks, 5 mid tier tanks, 5 bottom tier per side).  

What we see now is 1:1 ratio or worse, meaning at least 7-8 top tier tanks and up to 10, and the remaining tanks being mid or bottom tier. Instances where a battle is made up of the same tier (all 10s, all 8s) should not happen. And they do.

It has been an issue for a very long time, now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not true. On the US servers, 66% (2/3 games) of the time you are bottom tier save for tier 1, 2 and limited mm tanks. </p>
<p>Furthermore the tier ratio is generally skewed, where top tiers are dominant, while the lower tiers are fewer in number. This should not happen, and tiers should be more evenly spread in a game, with at least a ratio of 1:3 or less (i.e. 5 top tier tanks, 5 mid tier tanks, 5 bottom tier per side).  </p>
<p>What we see now is 1:1 ratio or worse, meaning at least 7-8 top tier tanks and up to 10, and the remaining tanks being mid or bottom tier. Instances where a battle is made up of the same tier (all 10s, all 8s) should not happen. And they do.</p>
<p>It has been an issue for a very long time, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ioan Constantin</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ioan Constantin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Narrower fov leads to seizures and motion sickness. It is a well documented medical condition, many people suffer from, hence FOV sliders in all respectable FPS games. 

They could add a fov slider, if they really cared about it. But the simpler, elegant solutions aren&#039;t WG&#039;s forte. 

Nevertheless, this begs the question, why screw around with stuff that does not need fixing?

FOV has absolutely no impact on FPS. Console games (typically last generation ones) have a narrower FOV because they only support TV resolutions (particularly number of horizontal pixels), on which they play. It is a non-issue because console games are generally played in a living room, far away from the screen, thus fitting well with the perspective of the eye. 

This is not the case with PC games, where the distance between the player and the screen is about 40 centimeters or less (5 times shorter).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrower fov leads to seizures and motion sickness. It is a well documented medical condition, many people suffer from, hence FOV sliders in all respectable FPS games. </p>
<p>They could add a fov slider, if they really cared about it. But the simpler, elegant solutions aren&#8217;t WG&#8217;s forte. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, this begs the question, why screw around with stuff that does not need fixing?</p>
<p>FOV has absolutely no impact on FPS. Console games (typically last generation ones) have a narrower FOV because they only support TV resolutions (particularly number of horizontal pixels), on which they play. It is a non-issue because console games are generally played in a living room, far away from the screen, thus fitting well with the perspective of the eye. </p>
<p>This is not the case with PC games, where the distance between the player and the screen is about 40 centimeters or less (5 times shorter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Lova Lova</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Lova Lova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much prefer the bottom (live) FOV personally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much prefer the bottom (live) FOV personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ooorky1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ooorky1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Playing with FOV is a very old thing. Basically every FPS has reduced FOV on consoles compared to PC, because in this way they can increase fps (the frame per second one).
Maybe they chosen narrower FOV to make the upcoming  &quot;HD client&quot; playable for more players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing with FOV is a very old thing. Basically every FPS has reduced FOV on consoles compared to PC, because in this way they can increase fps (the frame per second one).<br />
Maybe they chosen narrower FOV to make the upcoming  &#8220;HD client&#8221; playable for more players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfhere</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfhere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new fixed FOV is a lousy idea.  A monitor&#039;s screen ratio should determine the FOV.  Some are 5:4, 16:10, 16:9 or 21:9.  Mine is 21:9 (2560x1080) and fixing the FOV to 90 is going to make it look terrible at the edges.  Everything will be stretched.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new fixed FOV is a lousy idea.  A monitor&#8217;s screen ratio should determine the FOV.  Some are 5:4, 16:10, 16:9 or 21:9.  Mine is 21:9 (2560&#215;1080) and fixing the FOV to 90 is going to make it look terrible at the edges.  Everything will be stretched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A s</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[und what? take slow td. and pick up different target or change map sides.good luck. the problem with MM is not spread +-2, but I think the better you perform the lower you are. and etc. but what to do.we love tanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>und what? take slow td. and pick up different target or change map sides.good luck. the problem with MM is not spread +-2, but I think the better you perform the lower you are. and etc. but what to do.we love tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kauris Azurai</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kauris Azurai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 01:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Vixatious 
Agreed. too many whiners need to uninstall and play a game that doesn&#039;t make them mad. 

@joyuesp
I love this game. and hardly even use Gold ammo. My favorite tank is M7. And I&#039;ve done 1,600 damage in it once(I also did a fair amount of spotting damage that match). I&#039;ve also taken out a T29 that never saw me. I continually tracked him and did 75 damage till he was dead. (I bet he was mad :P)

Most players think M7 is a useless piece of garbage it uses the 6-pdr 105 pen, 75 damage gun- and has no armour to speak of. Yet it can be used very well in tier 5-7 games. The point I&#039;m trying to make here is, the matchups are perfectly fine.
Think I&#039;m some uber who can play like magic? HECK NO. I&#039;m horrible. Check my stats on noobmeter, I&#039;m not that good. But I at least put SOME effort in learning how to play.

(My username is &quot;Kauris&quot; NOT Kauris Azurai) NA server Noobmeter.com check it.
Not some unicum uber player. just a normal non-whiner.

I, unlike some others, RELISH a challenge. Take away the two tier spread and the good, semi-good (and the non scrub sort-of competent like me) players have no challenge anymore. the game becomes too easy. Three-four tier spread is way too much, but -1 +1 is too little....

Please go to youtube and try to learn some. and get at least 6,000 battles before complaining. And If you&#039;re past 6,000 battles and still don&#039;t like it. maybe this ain&#039;t the game for you pardna.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vixatious<br />
Agreed. too many whiners need to uninstall and play a game that doesn&#8217;t make them mad. </p>
<p>@joyuesp<br />
I love this game. and hardly even use Gold ammo. My favorite tank is M7. And I&#8217;ve done 1,600 damage in it once(I also did a fair amount of spotting damage that match). I&#8217;ve also taken out a T29 that never saw me. I continually tracked him and did 75 damage till he was dead. (I bet he was mad :P)</p>
<p>Most players think M7 is a useless piece of garbage it uses the 6-pdr 105 pen, 75 damage gun- and has no armour to speak of. Yet it can be used very well in tier 5-7 games. The point I&#8217;m trying to make here is, the matchups are perfectly fine.<br />
Think I&#8217;m some uber who can play like magic? HECK NO. I&#8217;m horrible. Check my stats on noobmeter, I&#8217;m not that good. But I at least put SOME effort in learning how to play.</p>
<p>(My username is &#8220;Kauris&#8221; NOT Kauris Azurai) NA server Noobmeter.com check it.<br />
Not some unicum uber player. just a normal non-whiner.</p>
<p>I, unlike some others, RELISH a challenge. Take away the two tier spread and the good, semi-good (and the non scrub sort-of competent like me) players have no challenge anymore. the game becomes too easy. Three-four tier spread is way too much, but -1 +1 is too little&#8230;.</p>
<p>Please go to youtube and try to learn some. and get at least 6,000 battles before complaining. And If you&#8217;re past 6,000 battles and still don&#8217;t like it. maybe this ain&#8217;t the game for you pardna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SBKDisco</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SBKDisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like how? It has long been known that you can spend only so many battles on the bottom of the team (and then the system puts you on top) and that the amount of battles you spread on top and on bottom is roughly equal.

Is that a fact? Because I keep a record of the battle tiers I don&#039;t get anywhere near an equal amount of top tier battles. It is nearer 20% Own tier - 38% +1 &amp; 42% +2 (+2 = T5 tank in T7 battle etc) There are other players who keep a record too, and they also get a broadly similar tier balance to me.  I have been trying to establish whether there is any mechanism in place to ensure that everyone has a fair spread of battles in their own as well as +1 &amp; +2 tiers. 

I have never been able to find anything which even mentions this subject, much less confirms there is supposed to be something in place to ensure we all get put in an equal amount of +2 battles, almost always with a team that doesn&#039;t have any brains between them, which promotes the bottom tiers to the official rank of cannon fodder for noobs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like how? It has long been known that you can spend only so many battles on the bottom of the team (and then the system puts you on top) and that the amount of battles you spread on top and on bottom is roughly equal.</p>
<p>Is that a fact? Because I keep a record of the battle tiers I don&#8217;t get anywhere near an equal amount of top tier battles. It is nearer 20% Own tier &#8211; 38% +1 &amp; 42% +2 (+2 = T5 tank in T7 battle etc) There are other players who keep a record too, and they also get a broadly similar tier balance to me.  I have been trying to establish whether there is any mechanism in place to ensure that everyone has a fair spread of battles in their own as well as +1 &amp; +2 tiers. </p>
<p>I have never been able to find anything which even mentions this subject, much less confirms there is supposed to be something in place to ensure we all get put in an equal amount of +2 battles, almost always with a team that doesn&#8217;t have any brains between them, which promotes the bottom tiers to the official rank of cannon fodder for noobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lemonizzle</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/02/storm-asks-about-8-11-fov/#comment-113530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lemonizzle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 22:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=8119#comment-113530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+/-1 MM will definitely not come, “the game would become not interesting”

=not beneficial

Fov change is the second thing that really pissed me off (after luchs moved to tier4). i cant pull back the camera enough to see something behind me, it feels like when horses get that black stuff on their head which blocks their eyes to concentrate on other thing than the road.
Wg better not implement this, or it&#039;s time to download camera mods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+/-1 MM will definitely not come, “the game would become not interesting”</p>
<p>=not beneficial</p>
<p>Fov change is the second thing that really pissed me off (after luchs moved to tier4). i cant pull back the camera enough to see something behind me, it feels like when horses get that black stuff on their head which blocks their eyes to concentrate on other thing than the road.<br />
Wg better not implement this, or it&#8217;s time to download camera mods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
